Corpus ID: 15624887

Unintended Consequences of the Independent Board Requirement on CEO Power

@inproceedings{Kim2010UnintendedCO,
  title={Unintended Consequences of the Independent Board Requirement on CEO Power},
  author={E. Han Kim and Yao Lu},
  year={2010}
}
NYSE and NASDAQ listed firms are required to have a majority of independent directors starting 2004. Since the regulation can weaken CEO influence over the board, affected CEOs may counter it by building a closely aligned team of top executives to strengthen their structural power. Using a differences-indifferences approach, we find that affected CEOs fill their executive suites with significantly higher abnormal fractions of top executives hired or promoted during their tenure, and with… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
Are Incentive Contracts Rigged by Powerful CEOs?
We argue that powerful CEOs induce their boards to shift the weight on performance measures towards the better performing measures, thereby rigging the incentive part of their pay. The intuition isExpand
The Effects and Unintended Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the Supply and Demand for Directors
Using eight thousand public companies, we study the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 and other contemporary reforms on directors and boards, guided by their impact on the supply andExpand
Unintended Consequences of Granting Small Firms Exemptions from Securities Regulation: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
This paper provides evidence about the unintended consequences arising when small companies are exempted from costly regulations-these firms have incentives to stay small. Between 2003 and 2008, theExpand
Determinants of Board Size and Composition: A Theory of Corporate Boards
This paper models the interaction of firm insiders and outsiders on a corporate board and addresses the question of the board's ideal size and composition. In the model, the board is responsible forExpand
Does Corporate Governance Matter in Competitive Industries?
By reducing the threat of a hostile takeover, business combination (BC) laws weaken corporate governance and increase the opportunity for managerial slack. Consistent with the notion that competitionExpand
A Theory of Board Control and Size
We extend the traditional view of corporate boards as monitors to include a role for outside board members as suppliers of expertise or information. Indeed, both outsiders and insiders may haveExpand
Governance Mechanisms and Equity Prices
We investigate how the market for corporate control (external governance) and shareholder activism (internal governance) interact. A portfolio that buys firms with the highest level of takeoverExpand
Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance
Executives can only impact firm outcomes if they have influence over crucial decisions. Based on this idea we develop and test the hypothesis that firms whose CEOs have more decision-making powerExpand
Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
This paper investigates the economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) by examining market reactions to related legislative events. Using concurrent stock returns of non-U.S.-tradedExpand
Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation
We find that institutional ownership concentration is positively related to the pay-for-performance sensitivity of executive compensation and negatively related to the level of compensation, evenExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...