Understanding the Relationship between Attribute-Based and Metaphor-Based Dehumanization

@article{Loughnan2009UnderstandingTR,
  title={Understanding the Relationship between Attribute-Based and Metaphor-Based Dehumanization},
  author={S. Loughnan and N. Haslam and Y. Kashima},
  journal={Group Processes \& Intergroup Relations},
  year={2009},
  volume={12},
  pages={747 - 762}
}
Previous research has adopted two distinct approaches to the study of dehumanization. One has focused on the denial of human attributes to groups (attribute-based dehumanization) and the other on the likening of group members to nonhumans (metaphor-based dehumanization). The relationship between these two approaches has yet to be examined. The current studies seek to clarify this relationship by integrating the two approaches. Using Haslam and colleagues’ (Haslam, 2006; Haslam, Loughnan… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

European Review of Social
Summary The attribute-based and metaphor-based approaches that are summarisedabove have dominated research on dehumanisation in the past 10 years.Broadly speaking they can be differentiated on theExpand
Perception of mind and dehumanization: Human, animal, or machine?
TLDR
This work performed two studies to find different (de)humanized images for three targets: Professional people, Evil people, and Lowest of the low, expecting the last two categories to be dehumanized through denial of agency or experience or experience compared with humanized targets. Expand
Animalistic Dehumanization of Older People by Younger Ones: Variations of Humanness Perceptions as a Function of a Target’s Age
TLDR
Ass associations of older people with humanness are investigated and it is shown that characteristics initially attributed to older people are perceived as denoting lesser humanness than when these same characteristics are associated with younger people. Expand
The psychology of humanness.
TLDR
This chapter presents a model of the diverse ways in which humanness can be denied to people, and examines additional topics that the psychology of humanness clarifies, notably the perception of nonhuman animals and the objectification of women. Expand
Determinants and Consequences of Dehumanization: An Interspecies Model of Prejudice
Dehumanizing ideologies that explicitly liken other humans to “inferior” animals can have negative consequences for intergroup attitudes and relations. Surprisingly, very little is known about theExpand
Excluded from Humanity: the Effects of Implicit Dehumanizing Views Toward Black Individuals in the Media
Dehumanization—a process by which certain individuals and/or social groups are denied complete human status—has been researched extensively in psychology. Previous research on dehumanization hasExpand
How do different humanness measures relate? Confronting the attribution of secondary emotions, human uniqueness, and human nature traits
TLDR
The relationship between the infrahumanization approach and the two-dimensional model of humanness is examined, highlighting the importance of considering the common aspects of both approaches in understanding processes of dehumanization. Expand
Intergroup contact as a strategy to improve humanness attributions: A review of studies
Over the past 15 years, outgroup dehumanization has been a topic of great interest in the field of social psychology. Researchers have in particular investigated the different forms of dehumanizationExpand
Dehumanization in children: the link with moral disengagement in bullying and victimization.
TLDR
It is indicated that children are able to distinguish different forms and targets of dehumanization and that dehumanization plays a distinct role from moral disengagement in bullying and victimization. Expand
Humanness beliefs about behavior: An index and comparative human-nonhuman behavior judgments
TLDR
Using a range of 60 prosocial, nonsocial, and antisocial behaviors, it was demonstrated that people discriminate between species-typical and species-unique behaviors and that the capacity to perform species- unique behaviors distinguishes humans from animals, whereas the capacity from species-Typical behaviors distinguishes human from robots. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
Dehumanization: An Integrative Review
  • N. Haslam
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2006
TLDR
An expanded sense of dehumanization emerges, in which the phenomenon is not unitary, is not restricted to the intergroup context, and does not occur only under conditions of conflict or extreme negative evaluation. Expand
Beyond secondary emotions: The infrahumanization of outgroups using human-related and animal-related words
This paper reports four series of studies that examined the infrahumanization effect using a different measure. Across the four studies, we examined whether people would associate their ingroup moreExpand
THE MISSING LINK : INGROUP, OUTGROUP AND THE HUMAN SPECIES
Individuals tend to associate uniquely human features, for example the fact of feeling secondary emotions, more to ingroup than to outgroup. However, little evidence exists for a direct link betweenExpand
The career of metaphor.
TLDR
The career of metaphor hypothesis offers a unified theoretical framework that can resolve the debate between comparison and categorization models of metaphor and suggests that whether metaphors are processed directly or indirectly and whether they operate at the level of individual concepts or entire conceptual domains, will depend both on their degree of conventionality and on their linguistic form. Expand
Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures
To understand dehumanization, we must understand how humans are contrasted with nonhumans. Our work (Haslam, 2006) proposes two forms of dehumanization, in which people are denied uniquely humanExpand
Humanizing the Self: Moderators of the Attribution of Lesser Humanness to Others
  • N. Haslam, P. Bain
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Personality & social psychology bulletin
  • 2007
Three studies investigated moderators of the tendency to attribute greater humanness to the self than to others, an interpersonal counterpart of outgroup infra-humanization. Study 1 demonstrated thatExpand
More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others.
TLDR
People perceive themselves to be more essentially human than others, and propose a corresponding phenomenon in interpersonal comparisons: People attribute greater humanness to themselves than to others, independent of self-enhancement. Expand
Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups
According to the psychological essentialism perspective, people tend to explain differences between groups by attributing them different essences. Given a pervasive ethnocentrism, this tendencyExpand
Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences
Infra-humanizing outgroups involves considering outgroups less human and more animal-like than the ingroup, which is perceived, in essence, as fully human. In this article, the first section presentsExpand
The automaticity of infra-humanization
This research tested the infra-humanization hypothesis that uniquely human emotions (e.g., love, sorrow) are automatically more linked in memory with the in-group than with the out-group. No suchExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...