Understanding the Relationship between Attribute-Based and Metaphor-Based Dehumanization

@article{Loughnan2009UnderstandingTR,
  title={Understanding the Relationship between Attribute-Based and Metaphor-Based Dehumanization},
  author={S. Loughnan and N. Haslam and Yoshihisa Kashima},
  journal={Group Processes & Intergroup Relations},
  year={2009},
  volume={12},
  pages={747 - 762}
}
  • S. Loughnan, N. Haslam, Yoshihisa Kashima
  • Published 2009
  • Psychology
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Previous research has adopted two distinct approaches to the study of dehumanization. One has focused on the denial of human attributes to groups (attribute-based dehumanization) and the other on the likening of group members to nonhumans (metaphor-based dehumanization). The relationship between these two approaches has yet to be examined. The current studies seek to clarify this relationship by integrating the two approaches. Using Haslam and colleagues’ (Haslam, 2006; Haslam, Loughnan… CONTINUE READING

    Figures and Tables from this paper.

    The psychology of humanness.
    • 40
    Determinants and Consequences of Dehumanization: An Interspecies Model of Prejudice
    • 1

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
    Dehumanization: An Integrative Review
    • 1,307
    • PDF
    The career of metaphor.
    • 762
    • PDF
    More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others.
    • 326
    • PDF
    Humanizing the Self: Moderators of the Attribution of Lesser Humanness to Others
    • 119
    Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups
    • 461
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    THE MISSING LINK : INGROUP, OUTGROUP AND THE HUMAN SPECIES
    • 51
    Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.
    • 1,495
    • PDF
    Not yet human: implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences.
    • 442
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF