• DOI:10.1080/02783190509554299
• Corpus ID: 52034623

Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school

@article{Reis2004UnderstandingRI,
  title={Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school},
  author={Sally M. Reis and Robert D. Colbert and Thomas P. H{\'e}bert},
  journal={Roeper Review},
  year={2004},
  volume={27},
  pages={110 - 120}
}

• S. Reis, Robert D. Colbert, Thomas P. Hébert
• Published 1 December 2004
• Education
• Roeper Review

This article summarizes findings from a 3‐year study of 35 economically disadvantaged, ethnically diverse, academically talented high school students who either achieved or underachieved in their urban high school. In particular, the resilience of these two groups of high ability students is explored. Comparative case study and ethnographic methods were used to examine the ways in which some academically talented students develop and/or employ strategies associated with resilience to achieve at high levels. Both risk factors and protective factors are examined to explore participants’ pathways toward either positive or negative outcomes. The results of this study suggest that some protective factors helped some academically talented students to achieve at high levels. The protective factors include supportive adults; friendships with other achieving students; opportunity to take honors and advanced classes; participation in multiple extracurricular activities both after school and during the summer; the development of a strong belief in self; and ways to cope with the negative aspects of their school and urban environment; and in some cases, their family lives. Other protective factors include students’ relationships with supportive adults and their previous participation in a gifted and talented program. Students who underachieved had specific risk factors, such as having older siblings who dropped out of school or became involved in drugs and/or alcohol. They also appeared to have developed fewer protective factors. The combination of the presence of risk factors and the absence of protective factors may ha ve impeded the ability of some underachieving students to achieve at higher levels.