Understanding Gauge

@article{Weatherall2016UnderstandingG,
  title={Understanding Gauge},
  author={James Owen Weatherall},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={2016},
  volume={83},
  pages={1039 - 1049}
}
I consider two usages of the expression “gauge theory.” On one, a gauge theory is a theory with excess structure; on the other, a gauge theory is any theory appropriately related to classical electromagnetism. I make precise one sense in which one formulation of electromagnetism, the paradigmatic gauge theory on both usages, may be understood to have excess structure and then argue that gauge theories on the second usage, including Yang-Mills theory and general relativity, do not generally have… 
Sizing up gauge
Gauge theories feature a distinction between "large" and "small" gauge transformations. Small gauge transformations are said to relate two models representing the same physical state, while large
Separability in gauge theories
Much of the philosophical literature on classical Yang--Mills theories is concerned with the differences between interpretations that represent the state of the world in terms of fields and those
Invariance, Interpretation, and Motivation
In this article I assess the Invariance Principle, which states that only quantities that are invariant under the symmetries of our theories are physically real. I argue, contrary to current
Is the classical limit "singular"?
On Gravitational Energy in Newtonian Theories
There are well-known problems associated with the idea of (local) gravitational energy in general relativity. We offer a new perspective on those problems by comparison with Newtonian gravitation,
Why Surplus Structure Is Not Superfluous
TLDR
This article precisify what is meant by surplus structure by means of functorial comparisons with equivalence classes of gauge fields, and shows that such structure is essential for any theory that represents a rich collection of physically relevant fields that are ‘local’ in nature.
I ain't afraid of no ghost.
  • J. Dougherty
  • Philosophy
    Studies in history and philosophy of science
  • 2021
Theoretical Equivalence in Physics
I review the philosophical literature on the question of when two physical theories are equivalent. This includes a discussion of empirical equivalence, which is often taken to be necessary, and
Sophistication about Symmetries
  • N. Dewar
  • Art
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2019
Suppose that one thinks that certain symmetries of a theory reveal ‘surplus structure’. What would a formalism without that surplus structure look like? The conventional answer is that it would be a
Are Newtonian Gravitation and Geometrized Newtonian Gravitation Theoretically Equivalent?
I argue that a criterion of theoretical equivalence due to Glymour (Noûs 11(3):227–251, 1977) does not capture an important sense in which two theories may be equivalent. I then motivate and state an
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
Gauging what's real : the conceptual foundations of contemporary gauge theories
Introduction 1. What is a Gauge Theory? 2. The Aharonov-Bohm E[currency]ect 3. Classical Gauge Theories 4. Interpreting Classical Gauge Theories 5. Quantized Yang-Mills Gauge Theories 6. The
Gauge Principles, Gauge Arguments and the Logic of Nature
I consider the question of how literally one can construe the “gauge argument,” which is the canonical means of understanding the putatively central import of local gauge symmetry principles for
Why Gauge?
The world appears to be well described by gauge theories; why? I suggest that gauge is more than mathematical redundancy. Gauge-dependent quantities can not be predicted, but there is a sense in
Are Newtonian Gravitation and Geometrized Newtonian Gravitation Theoretically Equivalent?
I argue that a criterion of theoretical equivalence due to Glymour (Noûs 11(3):227–251, 1977) does not capture an important sense in which two theories may be equivalent. I then motivate and state an
Fiber bundles, Yang–Mills theory, and general relativity
I articulate and discuss a geometrical interpretation of Yang–Mills theory. Analogies and disanalogies between Yang–Mills theory and general relativity are also considered.
On Einstein Algebras and Relativistic Spacetimes
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’
  • J. Weatherall
  • Philosophy
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2018
I argue that the hole argument is based on a misleading use of the mathematical formalism of general relativity. If one is attentive to mathematical practice, I will argue, the hole argument is
A Categorical Equivalence between Generalized Holonomy Maps on a Connected Manifold and Principal Connections on Bundles over that Manifold
A classic result in the foundations of Yang-Mills theory, due to J. W. Barrett ["Holonomy and Path Structures in General Relativity and Yang-Mills Theory." Int. J. Th. Phys. 30(9), (1991)],
Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory
In "Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory", David B. Malament presents the basic logical-mathematical structure of general relativity and considers a number
What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story
  • J. Earman, J. Norton
  • Philosophy, Physics
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1987
Spacetime substantivalism leads to a radical form of indeterminism within a very broad class of spacetime theories which include our best spacetime theory, general relativity. Extending an argument
...
...