Understanding Each Other: The Case of the Derrida-Searle Debate

@article{Raffel2011UnderstandingEO,
  title={Understanding Each Other: The Case of the Derrida-Searle Debate},
  author={S. Raffel},
  journal={Human Studies},
  year={2011},
  volume={34},
  pages={277-292}
}
  • S. Raffel
  • Published 2011
  • Sociology
  • Human Studies
This paper revisits the Derrida-Searle debate, an exchange that, unfortunately, did not lead to much, if any, mutual understanding. I will suggest that this failure can be traced back to key features of their respective theories. In that Searle and Derrida use their own theories of speech as resources in trying to understand each other, their unsuccessful communication can be used to reveal a great deal about the limitations of both their theories. My paper tries to draw out these limitations… Expand
Repolitizando las diferencias. Derrida y la teoría de los actos de habla
Models of Signification and Pedagogy in J. L. Austin, John Searle, and Jacques Derrida

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES
Wittgenstein and Derrida
Deconstruction: Theory and Practice.
Studies in Ethnomethodology
Writing and Difference
How to do things with words
A logic for ‘context’