Underestimating Our Influence Over Others’ Unethical Behavior and Decisions

@article{Bohns2014UnderestimatingOI,
  title={Underestimating Our Influence Over Others’ Unethical Behavior and Decisions},
  author={Vanessa K. Bohns and M. Mahdi Roghanizad and Amy Z. Xu},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2014},
  volume={40},
  pages={348 - 362}
}
We examined the psychology of “instigators,” people who surround an unethical act and influence the wrongdoer (the “actor”) without directly committing the act themselves. In four studies, we found that instigators of unethical acts underestimated their influence over actors. In Studies 1 and 2, university students enlisted other students to commit a “white lie” (Study 1) or commit a small act of vandalism (Study 2) after making predictions about how easy it would be to get their fellow… 

Figures from this paper

(Mis)Understanding Our Influence Over Others
I review a burgeoning program of research examining people’s perceptions of their influence over others. This research demonstrates that people are overly pessimistic about their ability to get
Don’t Blame Me, Blame Those around Me: How Family and Friends Induce Unethical Acts
ABSTRACT While family and close friends often encourage prosocial behaviors, their influence can also be malevolent. The current research examines how people react to scenarios where a close other
Underestimating our influence over others at work
Rejecting Unwanted Romantic Advances Is More Difficult Than Suitors Realize
In two preregistered studies, we find that initiators of unrequited romantic advances fail to appreciate the difficult position their targets occupy, both in terms of how uncomfortable it is for
Peers and offender decision‐making
Research Summary: Offender decision-making generally occurs in social context. In this article, we discuss the potential for integrating insights on peer processes and decision-making processes to
When do We Feel Responsible for Other People’s Behavior and Attitudes?
Originality/value of paper For decades, scholars researching social influence have explored how one’s behavior and attitudes are shaped by one’s social environment. However, amidst this focus on the
Normative goals and the regulation of social behavior: The case of respect
The rational actor model has a long and successful history of explaining human motivation across several disciplinary fields, but its focus on material self-interest fails to explain the many
Quick decisions tend to reinforce self-interest choices among MBA students: The direct and moderating effects of temporal constraint and situational factors in ethical decision making
Employees face increasingly time‐pressured operational environments. Using theory from Reynolds' (2006) neurocognitive model of ethical decision making, we explore how temporal constraint,
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 56 REFERENCES
Contagion and Differentiation in Unethical Behavior
TLDR
The results suggest that individuals' unethicality does not depend on the simple calculations of cost-benefit analysis, but rather depends on the social norms implied by the dishonesty of others and also on the saliency of dishonesty.
Underestimating one’s influence in help-seeking.
Excerpt] Robert Cialdini's book, Influence (Cialdini, 1984), has counseled countless readers on the art and science of persuasion. Some have read the book looking for tips on how to become more
Lying to Level the Playing Field: Why People May Dishonestly Help or Hurt Others to Create Equity
Unethical and dishonest behavior has increasingly attracted the attention of scholars from various disciplines. Recent work has begun to focus on a previous overlooked factor predicting dishonest
Illusion of Control
TLDR
Those acting more often to obtain the outcome developed stronger illusions, and so did their yoked counterparts, and this work proposes that this may be due to a bias in contingency detection which occurs when the probability of the action and of the potential cause is high.
The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states.
TLDR
Three sets of studies provide evidence for an illusion of transparency, or a tendency for people to overestimate the extent to which others can discern their internal states, and the implications of this illusion for people's reluctance to intervene in emergencies.
Underestimating our influence over others at work
Do collectivists know themselves better than individualists? Cross-cultural studies of the holier than thou phenomenon.
TLDR
Discussion centers on culturally specific motivations that may bias the accuracy of self-insight and social insight and collectivists provide more accurate self-predictions of future behavior in situations with moral or altruistic overtones.
...
...