U.S. attitudes on human genome editing

  title={U.S. attitudes on human genome editing},
  author={Dietram A. Scheufele and Michael A. Xenos and Emily L. Howell and Kathleen M. Rose and Dominique Brossard and Bruce W. Hardy},
  pages={553 - 554}
Although views on human genome editing differ, all want public engagement The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has given new urgency to calls from social scientists, bench scientists, and scientific associations for broad public dialogue about human genome editing and its applications. Most recently, these calls were formalized in a consensus report on the science, ethics, and governance of human genome editing released by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National… Expand
Societal and Ethical Impacts of Germline Genome Editing: How Can We Secure Human Rights?
An approach that relies not only on agreed-upon principles and a democratic process but requires a Human Rights Impact Assessment to evaluate the potential burdens that such biomedical interventions may place on human rights is proposed. Expand
Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Public Engagement Imperative.
In this communication, the authors lay out the foundational principles undergirding the formation, modification, and evaluation of public opinion that will determine the societal decision to warrant or enjoin the clinical conduct of HHGE. Expand
Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing
The application of gene editing technologies to prevent or mitigate genetic disease in humans is considered one of its most promising applications. However, as the technology advances, it isExpand
CRISPR Ethics: Moral Considerations for Applications of a Powerful Tool.
It is held that moral decision making should evolve as the science of genomic engineering advances and it would be reasonable for national and supranational legislatures to consider evidence-based regulation of certain CRISPR applications for the betterment of human health and progress. Expand
Survey on the perception of germline genome editing among the general public in Japan
It is indicated that the Japanese people generally accepted the use of genome editing for disease-related genes, but many were concerned about the risks and many Japanese people did not understand the technology well. Expand
What we know about effective public engagement on CRISPR and beyond
This work systematize common goals, principles, and modalities of public engagement on CRISPR and other emerging technologies, and evaluates empirically the likely successes of various modalities. Expand
A Need for Better Understanding Is the Major Determinant for Public Perceptions of Human Gene Editing.
The results suggest that public resistance to human somatic or embryonic gene editing does not stem from an inherent mistrust of genome modification, but rather a desire for greater understanding, and demonstrate that factors influencing public opinion vary greatly amongst demographic groups. Expand
Genom-Editierung mit CRISPR/Cas9: Vorzeichen einer neuen Epoche der Medizin?
While genome editing is already well established in laboratory research, clinical applications based on genome editing are close and for the first time, targeted corrections of genetic defects in somatic cells, stem cells as well as in the germ line appear technically feasible. Expand
Gene editing in human development: ethical concerns and practical applications
This Spotlight summarizes some of the ethical considerations associated with the use of gene-editing techniques in human embryos and embryo-like entities, highlighting the need for open and informed debate. Expand
Gene editing isn't just about food: comments from U.S. focus groups.
It is found that when asked about thoughts regarding gene editing, adult focus groups discussed medical applications more frequently and extensively than agricultural applications, and designer babies, cures for disease, and food were discussed at similar lengths. Expand


Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Research on public attitudes toward controversial science seem to be divided between a camp that relies on a ‘scientific literacy model’, which states that increase in public knowledge of science isExpand
Sciupac, “U.S. public wary of biomedical technologies to ‘enhance’ human abilities
  • (Pew Research
  • 2016
The public and genetic editing, testing, and therapy
  • 2016
U.S. public wary of biomedical technologies to 'enhance' human abilities
  • 2016