Two-years results of native tissue versus vaginal mesh repair in the treatment of anterior prolapse according to different success criteria: A randomized controlled trial.

@article{Dias2016TwoyearsRO,
  title={Two-years results of native tissue versus vaginal mesh repair in the treatment of anterior prolapse according to different success criteria: A randomized controlled trial.},
  author={M{\'a}rcia Regina Messaggi Gomes Dias and Rodrigo de A. Castro and Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini and Carlos Antonio Delroy and Paulo C F Martins and Manoel Jo{\~a}o Batista de Castello Gir{\~a}o and Marair Gr{\'a}cio Ferreira Sartori},
  journal={Neurourology and urodynamics},
  year={2016},
  volume={35 4},
  pages={509-14}
}
AIMS To compare efficacy and safety of the traditional colporraphy and transvaginal polypropylene mesh for the treatment of advanced anterior vaginal prolapse according to different success criteria in two-year follow-up. METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, women with anterior prolapse stage II or greater, with Ba point ≥ +1 (POP-Q quantification), were randomly assigned to have either anterior colporraphy (n = 43) or transvaginal mesh repair (n = 43). The primary outcome was to… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-9 of 9 extracted citations

The treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapsed by repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy

International Urology and Nephrology • 2015
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…