Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.

@article{Skaane2014TwoviewDB,
  title={Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.},
  author={Per Skaane and Andriy I. Bandos and Ellen B Eben and Ingvild N Jebsen and Mona Krager and Unni Haakenaasen and Ulrika Ekseth and Mina Izadi and Solveig Hofvind and Randi Gullien},
  journal={Radiology},
  year={2014},
  volume={271 3},
  pages={
          655-63
        }
}
PURPOSE To compare the performance of two versions of reconstructed two-dimensional (2D) images in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus the performance of standard full-field digital mammography (FFDM) plus DBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS This trial had ethical committee approval, and all participants gave written informed consent. Examinations (n = 24 901) in women between the ages of 50 and 69 years (mean age, 59.2 years) were interpreted prospectively as part of a… 
Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial
TLDR
A comparison of screening efficacy parameters resulting from DBT+s2D versus the current screening standard 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a multicentre and multivendor setting on the basis of the quality-controlled, population-based, biennial mammography screening programme in Germany is designed.
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
TLDR
DBT plus synthetic 2D imaging increases CDRs with recall rates comparable to those of FFDM, and increased image reading time and the time needed for invasive assessments.
Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial).
TLDR
The addition of DBT increased the sensitivity of 2D mammography in patients with dense breasts and the specificity of 2 D mammography for all subgroups, and the use of synthetic 2D DBT demonstrated performance similar to that of standard 2D Mammography with DBT.
Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer
TLDR
The results indicate that SM may eliminate the need for additional FFDM during DBT-based imaging, and two-dimensional SM may replace dose-requiring FFDM in DBT -based imaging.
Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms.
TLDR
The availability of prior FFDM or DBT images is a largely independent contributing factor in reducing recall recommendations during mammographic interpretation, and this effect did not change regardless of the sequence in presentation.
Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction
TLDR
In this study population, DBT plus FFDM, both with newly developed technology, provided diagnostic performance improved over the conventional FFDM alone, even at comparable MGD.
Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery
TLDR
To evaluate the recall rates of digital mammography and synthetic images after adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in patients with breast-conserving surgery, adding DBT to synthetic 2D images or DM shows significant reduction in recall rates compared with DM alone for women who undergo breast- Conserving surgery for breast cancer, regardless of mammographic density.
A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers
TLDR
Good agreement in lesion detection and characterization between FFDM and DBT images showed and it was demonstrated that combining DBT and FFDM is superior in detecting cancer compared to standard FFDM.
Digital breast tomosynthesis in one or two views as a replacement or adjunct technique to full-field digital mammography.
TLDR
Improvements in accuracy using DBT were present for different types of imaging protocols although the magnitude of the impact varied between studies, and some studies did not show significant improvements in comparison with FFDM.
Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories
TLDR
SM alone showed similar interpretive performance toFFDM, confirming its potential role as an alternative to FFDM in women having tomosynthesis, with the added advantage of halving the patient’s dose exposure.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
TLDR
Two-view tomosynthesis outperforms 2D mammography but only for readers with the least experience, and the benefits were seen for both masses and microcalcification.
Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography
TLDR
Breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has emerged as a valuable adjunct to mammography (MX) in terms of ROC curve area, sensitivity and specificity and was superior to two-view MX in recognising benign lesions.
Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
TLDR
Use of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast imaging may result in a substantial decrease in recall rate, and there was no convincing evidence that use of digital Breast Tomosynthesis alone or in combination with FFDM results in a significant improvement in sensitivity.
The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study.
TLDR
The purpose of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography (DM), single-view breast tomosynthesis (BT) and BT combined with the opposite DM view and found no differences between the combined modality andDual-view DM.
Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
TLDR
The use of mammography plus tomosynthesis in a screening environment resulted in a significantly higher cancer detection rate and enabled the detection of more invasive cancers.
Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.
TLDR
Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography offers the dual benefit of significantly increased diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduced recall rates for noncancer cases.
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting
TLDR
Comparing digital mammography and DBT in a side-by-side feature analysis for cancer conspicuity shows that there is a potential for increasing the sensitivity using this new technique, especially for cancers manifesting as spiculated masses and distortions.
Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
TLDR
In this small data set, FFDM appears to be slightly more sensitive than digital breast tomosynthesis for the detection of calcification, however, diagnostic performance as measured by area under the curve using BI-RADS was not significantly different.
...
1
2
...