Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together!

@article{Schwarz2000TwoWM,
  title={Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together!},
  author={Baruch B. Schwarz and Yair Neuman and Sarit Biezuner},
  journal={Cognition and Instruction},
  year={2000},
  volume={18},
  pages={461 - 494}
}
Several studies have investigated the cognitive development of interacting peers. This study focuses on a phenomenon that has not yet been studied: the cognitive gains of 2 children with low levels of competence who fail to solve a task individually but who improve when working in peer interaction. We show that this phenomenon (which we call the two-wrongs-make-a-right phenomenon) may occur when (a) the 2 wrongs disagree, (b) they have different strategies, and (c) active hypothesis testing is… 
Disagreement and causal learning: others' hypotheses affect children's evaluations of evidence.
TLDR
This study investigated whether children learn more from evidence generated by an agent who agrees with them or from one who disagrees with them, and suggested that children consider the relationship between their own and others' hypotheses when evaluating evidence that others generate.
How do new competences appear and how they disappear: Social interaction and cognitive development
The main goal of this work is to examine how different theoretical points of view (constructivist, co-constructivist and dynamical systems theory) explain the mechanism of creating new cognitive
Asymmetrical peer interaction as a factor of formal operations development in more competent students
This paper deals with the role of asymmetrical peer interaction in the development of formal operational thinking. The relevance of the research lies in the fact that influence of peers’
The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory
In this study, the effects of argumentation-eliciting interventions on conceptual understanding in evolution were investigated. Two experiments were conducted: In the 1st, 76 undergraduates were
Bridging a Conceptual Divide: How Peer Collaboration Facilitates Science Learning
TLDR
The findings indicate that collaboration in domains characterized by conceptual change is possible, but that learning from such collaboration is asymmetric (i.e., individuals with low levels of understanding benefit more than their partners do) and unequal ( i.e, individuals withLow levels ofUnderstanding benefit more if their partner’s understanding is only moderately higher).
Dialogical PISA: correct answers are all alike, every incorrect answer is incorrect in its own way
Why do students give incorrect answers in PISA? What are the reasons for giving incorrect answers? Do all incorrect answers reflect only the lack of competence or might even a competent child make a
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels
This article presents the results of two experiments addressing the relation of reasoning skill to student grade, ability, and knowledge levels. In the first experiment, three levels of students
Mind Bugs: The Origins of Procedural Misconceptions
From the Publisher: As children acquire arithmetic skills, they often develop "bugs" - small, local misconceptions that cause systematic errors. Mind Bugs combines a novel cognitive simulation
Arguing and Reasoning in Understanding Historical Topics
The positive effect of social interaction on children's reasoning has frequently been recognized. Social interaction provides a social support system, particularly for the acquisition of procedural
How Does the Process of Interaction Work When Two Interlocutors Try to Resolve a Logical Problem
TLDR
The present work has chosen a logical problem: the problem of the "four cards" (Wason & Johnson-Laird, 1972), because it is easier to describe the interactional emergence of a logical notion than that of an encyclopedic one.
Peers, Persuasion, and Piaget: Dyadic Interaction Between Conservers and Nonconservers. Developmental Program Report No. 44.
MILLER, SCOTT A., and BROWNELL, CELIA A. Peers, Persuasion, and Piaget: Dyadic Interaction between Conservers and Nonconservers. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1975, 46, 992-997. Second-grade children were
Intermediate Cognitive Organizations in the Process of Learning a Mathematical Concept: The Order of Positive Decimal Numbers
This investigation found that children use three implicit and incorrect rules when comparing decimal numbers and that these rules are intermediate levels of response in the process of learning
Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning
The object of this research was to provide an explicit test of the hypothesis that engagement in thinking about a topic enhances the quality of reasoning about that topic. Engagement took the form of
Reflective Processes in a Mathematics Classroom With a Rich Learning Environment
This article examines reflection in a rich mathematics learning environment characterized by multirepresentational tools and a sequence of problem situations. The study focuses on the development of
Reasoning in Conversation
This article is an early report on a project that aims to understand reasoning as a form of social practice. Joining the work of philosophers, linguists, and psychologists, this project is an effort
Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations
This paper presents two experiments to support the general hypothesis that the coordination of actions between individuals promotes the acquisition of cognitive coordinations. The first experiment
...
1
2
3
4
5
...