Two Concepts of Epistemic Injustice

@article{Coady2010TwoCO,
  title={Two Concepts of Epistemic Injustice},
  author={David Coady},
  journal={Episteme},
  year={2010},
  volume={7},
  pages={101 - 113}
}
  • D. Coady
  • Published 1 June 2010
  • Philosophy
  • Episteme
ABSTRACT I describe two concepts of epistemic injustice. The first of these concepts is explained through a critique of Alvin Goldman's veritistic social epistemology. The second is closely based on Miranda Fricker's concept of epistemic injustice. I argue that there is a tension between these two forms of epistemic injustice and tentatively suggest some ways of resolving the tension. 

A Third Conception of Epistemic Injustice

Scholars of epistemology have identified two conceptions of epistemic injustice: discriminatory epistemic injustice and distributive epistemic injustice. The former refers to wrongs to one’s capacity

Scientific/Intellectual Movements Remedying Epistemic Injustice: The Case of Indigenous Studies

Whereas much of the literature in the social epistemology of scientific knowledge has focused either on scientific communities or research groups, we examine the epistemic significance of

Harms and Wrongs in Epistemic Practice

Abstract This volume has its roots in two recent developments within mainstream analytic epistemology: a growing recognition over the past two or three decades of the active and social nature of our

CRITICAL INJUSTICE

In this paper I examine unjust deficits of criticism, or what I call cases of “critical injustice.” In paradigm cases of testimonial injustice, prejudice leads one person to give insufficient

Archives, Epistemic Injustice and Knowing the Past

ABSTRACT In this essay, I argue that the destruction or hiding of archives can cause long-lasting epistemic harms and constitute complex ethical challenges. The case of Kenya’s ‘migrated archives’ is

An Interview with Miranda Fricker

Miranda Fricker’s research carefully negotiates the fields of ethics and epistemology, and the places and points where they overlap and intersect. Her 2007 text Epistemic injustice: Power and the

Being Bound to Fail. How Epistemic Injustice Fails Educational Opportunities

Inequality is not exclusively a matter of unequal distribution of resources or opportunities. It also affects people's awareness of their social standing with regard to their fellow citizens. Should

A Relationship Focused Approach to Epistemic Injustice in Global Development Theory and Practice

Miranda Fricker’s theory of epistemic injustice articulates the connections between ethics and epistemology that come to light in the harms caused when someone is wronged in their capacities as a

Belief and Ameliorative Epistemology

My dissertation is in three parts. In “Evidentialism and Belief Polarization,” I consider the epistemic import of a belief revision process known as belief polarization, in which exposure to a mixed
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES

Knowledge and Acknowledgement: ‘Epistemic Injustice’ as a Problem of Recognition 1

‘Epistemic injustice’ concerns the process of credibility conferral upon knowledge claimants. The contention is that individuals belonging to marginalised or underprivileged groups may suffer from a

Powerlessness and Social Interpretation

ABSTRACT Our understanding of social experiences is central to our social understanding more generally. But this sphere of epistemic practice can be structurally prejudiced by unequal relations of

Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing

Preface Introduction 1. Testimonial Injustice 2. Prejudice In The Credibility Economy 3. Towards A Virtue Epistemological Account of Testimony 4. The Virtue of Testimonial Justice 5. The Genealogy of

Epistemic Justice and a Role for Virtue in the Politics of Knowing

The dual aim of this article is to reveal and explain a certain phenomenon of epistemic injustice as manifested in testimonial practice, and to arrive at a characterisation of the anti–prejudicial

IX—Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology

This paper explores the relation between rational authority and social power, proceeding by way of a philosophical genealogy derived from E. Craig's «Knowledge and the state of nature». The position

Epistemic Oppression and Epistemic Privilege

Definissant le phenomene d'oppression epistemique en termes de structuration de notre comprehension du monde social, l'A. etudie la strategie epistemologique de N. Hartsock qui consiste a opposer a

Knowledge in a Social World

PART I: FOUNDATIONS 1. EPISTEMOLOGY AND POSTMODERN RESISTANCE 2. TRUTH 3. THE FRAMEWORK PART II: GENERIC SOCIAL PRACTICES 4. TESTIMONY 5. ARGUMENTATION 6. THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS OF

Pathways to Knowledge: Private and Public

PART I. INTERNALISM, THE A PRIORI, AND EPISTEMIC VIRTUE 1. Internalism Exposed 2. A Priori Warrant and Naturalistic Epistemology 3. The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues PART II. INTUITION,

Epistemic Trust and Social Location

ABSTRACT Epistemic trustworthiness is defined as a complex character state that supervenes on a relation between first- and second-order beliefs, including beliefs about others as epistemic agents.