Two's Company, Three's a Crowd: Differences in Dominance Relationships in Isolated Versus Socially Embedded Pairs of Fish

@article{Chase2003TwosCT,
  title={Two's Company, Three's a Crowd: Differences in Dominance Relationships in Isolated Versus Socially Embedded Pairs of Fish},
  author={Ivan D Chase and Craig A. Tovey and Peter Murch},
  journal={Behaviour},
  year={2003},
  volume={140},
  pages={1193-1217}
}
Summary We performed experiments with cichlid e sh to test whether several basic aspects of dominance were the same in isolated pairs as in pairs within a social group of three or four. We found that the social context, whether a pair was isolated or within a group, strongly affected the basic properties of dominance relationships. In particular, the stability of relationships over time, the replication of relationships in successive meetings, and the extent of the loser effect were all signie… 

Tables from this paper

The "Two's Company, Three's a Crowd" Game
TLDR
This model suggests that a system of individuals, moving through an artificial world and reacting together, is adequate to account for the formation of some patterns comparable to those resulting from animal and human behavior.
Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society
TLDR
A new theory is presented, of a feedback loop between knowledge of rank and consequent behavior, that explains the transition to strategic aggression and the formation and persistence of dominance hierarchies in groups capable of both social memory and inference.
The ghost of social environments past: dominance relationships include current interactions and experience carried over from previous groups
TLDR
Using a fusion–fission protocol, groups of previously isolated shore crabs are fused into larger groups, and then restored groups to their original size and composition, in which experiences from previous groups can carry over to affect current competitive interactions.
Self-structuring properties of dominance hierarchies a new perspective.
The Fragility of Individual-Based Explanations of Social Hierarchies: A Test Using Animal Pecking Orders
TLDR
An example of a dynamic approach that considers dominance hierarchies to be dynamic networks, uses dynamic sequences of interaction (dynamic network motifs) to explain the organization of dominance hierarchie, and derives these dynamic sequences directly from observation of hierarchy formation is developed.
The use of multiple sources of social information in contest behavior: testing the social cognitive abilities of a cichlid fish
Theory suggests that living in large social groups with dynamic social interactions often favours the evolution of enhanced cognitive abilities. Studies of how animals assess their own contest
Data-Based Analysis of Winner-Loser Models of Hierarchy Formation in Animals
TLDR
The new behavioral dynamics of hierarchy formation discovered in the hen data suggest that members of groups are intensely aware both of their own interactions as well as interactions occurring among other members of their group.
Self-organizing dominance hierarchies in a wild primate population
TLDR
The results show that both social self-organization dynamics and prior attributes can combine to influence hierarchy dynamics even when agonistic interactions are strongly influenced by differences in individual attributes.
The dynamics of dominance: open questions, challenges and solutions
Although social hierarchies are recognized as dynamic systems, they are typically treated as static entities for practical reasons. Here, we ask what we can learn from a dynamical view of dominance,
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies
TLDR
The results suggest that dominance hierarchy formation is a much richer and more complex phenomenon than previously thought and the implications for evolutionary biology, the social sciences, and the use of animal models in understanding human social organization are explored.
Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning?.
. Considerable evidence across many taxa demonstrates that prior social experience affects the outcome of subsequent aggressive interactions. Although the 'loser effect', in which an individual
Modelling Dominance Hierarchy formation as a Multi-player game
TLDR
A model of dominance hierarchy formation using a multi-player extension of the classical Hawk-Dove game is introduced, and its emergent properties are discussed in the context of experimental observations.
Alliances as a means of competition in primates: Evolutionary, developmental, and cognitive aspects
Nonhuman primates commonly compete for mates, physical resources and dominance status. Competition is manifest in one-to-one contests or in more complex, multipartite aggressive interactions
Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure
TLDR
It is shown how individual-oriented (or artificial life) models may provide an integrative background for the development of theories about dominance by including effects of spatial structure in which the effects of winning and losing are self-reinforcing.
DYNAMICS OF HIERARCHY FORMATION: THE SEQUENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOMINANCE RELATIONSHIPS
A method for investigating the behavioral sequences used in forming dominance hierarchies is presented. There are four possible sequences for the formation of the first two dominance relationships in
The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences
TLDR
It is concluded that penultimate fighting experiences had a significant effect on the probability of winning a subsequent contest and a more recent experience had a more pronounced effect than an earlier experience.
...
...