Twenty Years of Co-decision Since Maastricht: Inter- and Intrainstitutional Implications

  title={Twenty Years of Co-decision Since Maastricht: Inter- and Intrainstitutional Implications},
  author={Anne Rasmussen},
  journal={Journal of European Integration},
  pages={735 - 751}
  • A. Rasmussen
  • Published 29 October 2012
  • Economics
  • Journal of European Integration
Abstract One of the most important institutional changes in the history of the EU was the introduction of the co-decision procedure in 1993. This new legislative procedure has transformed the EU system of governance by affecting both the balance of power between the EU institutions and their internal workings. This contribution takes stock of the first 20 years of co-decision by systematically bringing together and reviewing the findings in the existing literature on EU co-decision. Empirical… 
Legislative codecision and its impact on the political system of the European Union
The European Union (EU) has experienced a remarkable degree of change during its history: it legislates in an ever wider range of policy areas, and its institutions and decision-making processes have
The implications of the better regulation agenda for the European Parliament’s inter- and intra-institutional power relations
ABSTRACT How do the European Commission’s and the European Parliament (EP) Secretariat’s better regulation agendas affect the EP’s intra- and inter-institutional relations? Based on document analysis
The changing composition of the European parliament: MEPs from 1979 to 2014
This paper updates data on the EP’s composition in light of the latest electoral results. It points to the somewhat contradictory dynamics currently affecting the parliamentary space, and emphasizes
Euro crisis responses and the EU legal order : increased institutional variation or constitutional mutation?
Euro crisis reforms as major example of interstitial institutional change in the EU - Forms of institutional change : unusual sources of law, new tasks for the EU institutions, new organs, competence
Understanding media attention paid to negotiations on EU legislative acts: a cross-national study of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands
Abstract Studies of the news coverage of European Union (EU) affairs have not yet paid much attention to coverage of the negotiations leading to EU legislative acts. This article investigates the
The culture of trilogues
ABSTRACT There is surprisingly little knowledge about the informal ‘trilogues’ that play a pivotal role in almost 90 per cent of European Union legislation. This article maps out previously uncharted
Where Have the Guardians Gone? Law Enforcement and the Politics of Supranational Forbearance in the European Union
Why would a supranational law enforcer suddenly refrain from wielding its powers? We theorize the supranational politics of forbearance– the deliberate under-enforcement of the law– and distinguish
Legislative amendments and informal politics in the European Union: A text reuse approach
The ability to amend legislative proposals introduced by the Commission is central to legislative process in the European Union. Despite this, very few attempts have been made to capture and explain
Why Defend Something I Don’t Agree with? Conflicts within the Commission and Legislative Amendments in Trilogues
This article aims to examine the effect of intra‐institutional conflicts in the European Commission on the extent of changes made to legislative proposals in trilogue negotiations.Wedevelop and test


The Role of the European Commission in Co-Decision - a Strategic Facilitator Operating in a Situation of Structural Disadvantage
The co-decision procedure has had significant implications for the interaction between the EU institutions and has attracted the attention of a series of formal, rational choice institutionalists.
Early conclusion in bicameral bargaining: Evidence from the co-decision legislative procedure of the European Union
Time choices are a neglected aspect of the bicameral bargaining literature, even though they may both affect the efficiency of decision-making and have broader democratic implications. An analytical
The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union
In this paper we study the implications of the introduction of the co-decision procedure for the European Union‟s Common Agricultural Policy and its reform. We use a game-theoretical model of the
Maastricht and the Democratic Deficit
This chapter compares the power of the different institutional actors of the EU (Council Commission and European Parliament) under the cooperation and codecision procedures. A series of spatial
Reconsidering the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence: Formal vs. Informal Procedures
Abstract More and more legislative decisions are reached in early stages of the co‐decision procedure through informal negotiations among representatives of the EU institutions. This study argues
Moving Beyond Procedure
This article examines the influence of the European Parliament (EP) within the legislative process of the European Union. Although debate over the impact of the cooperation and co-decision I
"Legislative co-decision: A real step forward?"
Legislative co-decision for the European Parliament in certain areas of EU competence was one of the key changes introduced by the Maastricht Treaty. Further extension of the co-decision procedures
Time to Decide: The Effect of Early Agreements on Legislative Duration in the EU
The increased use of early agreements in the EU co-decision procedure raises the concern that intra and inter-institutional political debate is sacrificed for the sake of efficiency. We investigate
Challenging the Commission's right of initiative? Conditions for institutional change and stability
This article examines the conditions under which informal institutional change between EU Treaties becomes formalised in subsequent Treaties. Recent developments in institutional theory show how
How to Negotiate Under Co-Decision in the EU: Reforming Trilogues and First-Reading Agreements
The Constitutional Affairs Committee is currently reviewing the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure to increase the effectiveness, transparency and inclusiveness of first-reading agreements