Truth-telling in clinical practice and the arguments for and against: a review of the literature.

Abstract

In general, most, but not necessarily all, patients want truthfulness about their health. Available evidence indicates that truth-telling practices and preferences are, to an extent, a cultural artefact. It is the case that practices among nurses and doctors have moved towards more honest and truthful disclosure to their patients. It is interesting that arguments both for and against truth-telling are established in terms of autonomy and physical and psychological harm. In the literature reviewed here, there is also the view that truth-telling is essential because it is an intrinsic good, while it is argued against on the grounds of the uncertainty principle. Based on this review, it is recommended that practitioners ought to ask patients and patients' families what informational requirements are preferred, and research should continue into truth-telling in clinical practice, particularly to discover its very nature as a cultural artefact, and the other conditions and contexts in which truth-telling may not be preferred.

05010015020072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

227 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 227 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Tuckett2004TruthtellingIC, title={Truth-telling in clinical practice and the arguments for and against: a review of the literature.}, author={Anthony G Tuckett}, journal={Nursing ethics}, year={2004}, volume={11 5}, pages={500-13} }