Trust in Scholarly Communications and Infrastructure: Indigenous Data Sovereignty

  title={Trust in Scholarly Communications and Infrastructure: Indigenous Data Sovereignty},
  author={Katharina Ruckstuhl},
  journal={Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics},
  • K. Ruckstuhl
  • Published 12 January 2022
  • Political Science
  • Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
Many Indigenous people have a deep mistrust of research, with some describing research as one of the “dirtiest” words in Indigenous language. The histories and experiences behind such mistrust are long and painful. Given what has been perceived as Indigenous objectification at the hands of largely Anglo-European others for research from which they fail to benefit, many communities now refuse research unless it is undertaken under certain, Indigenous-defined circumstances. Such refusal is a move… 

Global Diversity in Higher Education Workforces: Towards Openness

In this article we discuss the collection and nature of diversity data relating to origin (ethnicity, race, nationality, indigeneity), gender/sex and disability in higher education institutional



Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an agenda

Overview As the global ‘data revolution’ accelerates, how can the data rights and interests of Indigenous peoples be secured? Premised on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous

Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations

The repositioning of authority over Indigenous data back to Indigenous peoples is argued for and there are significant obstacles to rebuilding effective Indigenous data systems and the process will require resources, time, and partnerships among Native nations, other governments, and data agents.

The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance

The goal is that stewards and other users of Indigenous data will ‘Be FAIR and CARE’ and the Principles complement the existing data-centric approach represented in the ‘FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’ (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable).

Who is indigenous? ‘Peoplehood’ and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity

Debate within global forums over establishing definitional standards for indigenous peoples versus an unlimited right of indigenous self-identification has exposed something of a dilemma over

Indigenous data, indigenous methodologies and indigenous data sovereignty

ABSTRACT The field of Indigenous methodologies has grown strongly since Tuhiwai Smith’s 1999 groundbreaking book Decolonizing Indigenous Methodologies. For the most part however, there has been a

Data sovereignty: A review

This study reviews 341 publications and proposes a conceptual grid to systematize different dimensions and connotations of data sovereignty, which alludes to a nuanced mixture of normative concepts such as inclusive deliberation and recognition of the fundamental rights of data subjects.

Rethinking the role of Indigenous knowledges in the academy

This paper is an invitation critically to engage in the discussion of ‘Indigenous knowledges’ and the implication for academic decolonization. Among the issues raised are questions of the definition

Settler–State Political Theory, ‘CANZUS’ and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

When the UN General Assembly voted in 2007 to adopt the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), only Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the USA cast negative votes. This article

Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism

What makes people love and die for nations, as well as hate and kill in their name? While many studies have been written on nationalist political movements, the sense of nationality - the personal