Trumping Precedent with Original Meaning: Not as Radical as It Sounds

@article{Barnett2005TrumpingPW,
  title={Trumping Precedent with Original Meaning: Not as Radical as It Sounds},
  author={Randy E. Barnett},
  journal={Constitutional commentary},
  year={2005},
  volume={22},
  pages={257-270}
}
In recent years, originalism as a method of interpretation has grown in its intellectual and practical appeal. The latest challenge to originalism from nonoriginalists is based on the doctrine of precedent. Acceptance of originalism, it is charged, would necessitate the reversal of crucially important landmark decisions and thereby provides a reductio ad absurdum of originalism. Until recently, few originalists have considered carefully the relationship between originalism and the doctrine of… 
9 Citations
Originalism, Stare Decisis, and Constitutional Authority
This chapter in the forthcoming volume "Precedent in the United States Supreme Court" (Springer 2013) examines the relationship among three normative questions about American constitutional law: How
Originalism and the 'Challenge of Change': Abduced-Principle Originalism and Other Mechanisms by Which Originalism Sufficiently Accommodates Changed Social Conditions
One of the most persistent criticisms of originalism - and also one of the most powerful - is that originalism is not a viable interpretative methodology because of the tremendous change that has
Settled Versus Right: A Theory of Precedent
principles to yield a discrete set of relevant considerations. When a new justice takes her place on the bench, she is greeted by a preexisting doctrine of stare decisis, just as she encounters
Originalism: A Critical Introduction
The theory of originalism is now well into its second wave. Originalism first came to prominence in the 1970s and 1980s as conservative critics reacted to the decisions of the Warren Court and the
Constitutional Method and the Path of Precedent
This chapter argues that methodologies of constitutional interpretation and questions of constitutional stare decisis are inextricably connected, such that courts cannot commit to a complete theory
A Description of Originalism
The history of American constitutional interpretation has largely been an originalist one. At the Founding, the Framers and Ratifiers employed originalism when debating, drafting, and authorizing the
Originalism's Promise