True Overconfidence: The Inability of Rational Information Processing to Account for Apparent Overconfidence

  title={True Overconfidence: The Inability of Rational Information Processing to Account for Apparent Overconfidence},
  author={Christoph Merkle and Martin Weber},
  journal={Behavioral \& Experimental Finance},
True Overconfidence in Interval Estimates: Evidence Based on a New Measure of Miscalibration
Overconfidence is often regarded as one of the most prevalent judgment biases. Several studies show that overconfidence can lead to suboptimal decisions of investors, managers, or politicians. Recent
The three faces of overconfidence
Overconfidence has been studied in 3 distinct ways. Overestimation is thinking that you are better than you are. Overplacement is the exaggerated belief that you are better than others. Overprecision
The Influence of Overconfidence and Competition Neglect On Entry Into Competition
I investigate whether two mechanisms leading to biased beliefs about success, overconfidence and competition neglect, influence decisions to enter competitive environments. I use a controlled
True Overconfidence , Revealed through Actions : An Experiment februAry 2017
IZA DP No. 10545 februAry 2017 True Overconfidence, Revealed through Actions: An Experiment* We report an experiment that infers true overconfidence in relative ability through actions, as opposed to
Persistent Overconfidence and Biased Memory: Evidence from Managers*
A long-standing puzzle is how overconfidence can persist in settings characterized by repeated feedback. This paper studies managers who participate repeatedly in a high-powered tournament incentive
How Group Identification Distorts Beliefs
This paper investigates whether people have distorted beliefs about the ability of the social groups they identify with. We find that experimentally manipulated identification with a randomly
Does the Better-than-Average Effect Show that People are Overconfident?: Two Experiments
We conduct a proper test of the claim that people are overconfident, in the sense that they believe that they are better than others. The results of the experiment we present do not allow us to
The Relevant Literature on Past Outcomes, Overconfidence and Risk Taking
Chapter 2 examines a large body of literature in cognitive psychology, behavioral economics, entrepreneurial, and organizational research to explore the relation between past outcomes overconfidence
Assessing Own Performance: Reported versus Inferred Confidence*
A large literature on overconfidence is based on experiments where subjects are asked to report non-incentivised confidence assessments of their own performance. The usual finding has been systematic
Belief Elicitation When More Than Money Matters: Controlling for “Control”
Elicitation mechanisms typically presume only money enters utility functions. However, nonmonetary objectives are confounders. In particular, psychologists argue people favor bets where ability is


The trouble with overconfidence.
Overprecision appears to be more persistent than either of the other 2 types of overconfidence, but its presence reduces the magnitude of both overestimation and overplacement.
Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.
Determining why some people, some domains, and some types of judgments are more prone to overconfidence will be important to understanding how confidence judgments are made.
Is Overconfidence a Judgment Bias ? Theory and Evidence ∗
Accurate assessments of one’s abilities are important in many domains. These assessments, e.g, form the basis for the choice of education, or the wage one is asking in wage negotiations. Evidence
Bayesian Overconfidence
This paper presents a reconciliation of the three distinct ways in which the economic literature has defined overconfidence: (1) overestimation of one's actual performance, (2) overestimation of
The Overconfidence Phenomenon as a Consequence of Informal Experimenter-Guided Selection of Almanac Items
Abstract The paper argues for an ecological approach to realism of confidence in general knowledge. It is stressed that choice of answer to almanac items and confidence judgments derive from
Overconfident: Do You Put Your Money on it?
A group exhibits overconfidence if significantly more than half the group members declare to be better than the median in some characteristic. Overconfidence was found in verbal reports for a variety
The False Consensus Effect and Overconfidence: Flaws in Judgment or Flaws in How We Study Judgment?
Abstract The false consensus effect and the overconfidence in judgment effect are often referred to as established “facts” of psychology. At present, the empirical support for these effects is
Overconfidence of Professionals and Lay Men : Individual Differences Within and Between Tasks?
Overconfidence can manifest itself in various forms. For example, people think that their knowledge is more precise than it really is (miscalibration) and they believe that their abilities are above