Trivial Tripwires?: Military Capabilities and Alliance Reassurance

@article{Blankenship2022TrivialTM,
  title={Trivial Tripwires?: Military Capabilities and Alliance Reassurance},
  author={Brian Blankenship and Erik Lin-Greenberg},
  journal={Security Studies},
  year={2022},
  volume={31},
  pages={92 - 117}
}
Abstract How can states most effectively reassure their allies? Existing studies assessing signals of commitment focus on the role of resolve in making assurances credible. This sidelines important questions about the role of capability. We argue that reassurance effectiveness is the product of both capability and resolve, and suggest that high resolve cannot offset low capability. We introduce a new typology of reassurance measures based on the interaction of military capability and resolve… 
1 Citations
Under the Umbrella: Nuclear Crises, Extended Deterrence, and Public Opinion
How robust is public support for extended nuclear deterrence in patron and client states? Recent studies have improved scholarly understanding of US public opinion about nuclear weapon use against

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES
The Influence of Sea Power on Politics: Domain- and Platform-Specific Attributes of Material Capabilities
Abstract Students of world politics have long shown a special interest in sea power. International relations, however, tends to treat the means of power as homogeneous and interchangeable. Are
Extended Deterrence and Allied Assurance: Key Concepts and Current Challenges for U.S. Policy
Abstract : The United States provides extended deterrence and assurance guarantees in vital strategic regions across the globe to protect U.S. allies and friends from intimidation, coercion, or
Assurance and US extended deterrence in NATO
Historically the NATO allies have focused considerable attention on US ‘extended deterrence’— that is, the extension by Washington of an umbrella of protection, sometimes called a ‘nuclear
DETERRENCE AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Debates
▪ Abstract The utility of military threats as a means to deter international crises and war has been a central topic of international relations research. Rational choice models have provided the
What Allies Want: Reconsidering Loyalty, Reliability, and Alliance Interdependence
Leaders believe that if their state abandons one ally during a crisis, then their state's other allies will expect similar disloyalty in the future. Thus, a single instance of disloyalty can damage,
Going the Distance: The Price of Projecting Power
The central purpose of this article is to establish the relationship between power projection, technology, and economic power. How economically powerful does a state need to be before it can afford
Security Commitments and Nuclear Proliferation
This article develops a theory connecting security commitments and the decision to acquire nuclear weapons. In a threatening environment, third party security commitments can reduce a state's fear of
Are Costly Signals More Credible? Evidence of Sender-Receiver Gaps
The idea that costly signals are more credible is a long-standing hypothesis in international politics. However, little is known on how costly signaling actually works. Causal evidence is elusive
Perception and misperception in international politics
This study of perception and misperception in foreign policy was a landmark in the application of cognitive psychology to political decision making. The New York Times called it, in an article
Testing Deterrence Theory: Rigor Makes a Difference
There is no consensus among scholars on how to test hypotheses about deterrence systematically. The disputes are sometimes rooted in differences about theory or sources of data, but they are
...
...