Triumph of the Null: Structure and Conflict in the Command of German Land Forces, 1939-1945

@article{Megargee1997TriumphOT,
  title={Triumph of the Null: Structure and Conflict in the Command of German Land Forces, 1939-1945},
  author={Geoffrey P. Megargee},
  journal={War in History},
  year={1997},
  volume={4},
  pages={60 - 80}
}
On 8 October 1943, the Organization Branch of the German Army General Staff officially confirmed a remarkable division of responsibilities within the High Command.1 The branch published a notice stating that the Chief of the General Staff was responsible only for the Field Army's operations in the east. Operations in the other theatres west, north, south and south-east were under the control of the Armed Forces Operations Staff, an element of the Armed Forces High Command.2 In other words, the… 
1 Citations

Figures from this paper

Anatomy of a Campaign: The British Fiasco in Norway, 1940
The British campaign in Norway in 1940 was an ignominious and abject failure. It is perhaps best known as the fiasco which directly led to the fall of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and his

References

SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES
Army several days earlier, but had been held up by the OKW
    Kriegstagebuch des Obekommandos der WeArmcAt (WehrmachifatAngsstab)
    • Dezember 1943 (Munich, Benard & Graefe, 1982) ii
    The Organizational Problems of the German High Command and Their Solutions
    • 1938
    For a typical example of the goingson at one of Hitler's conferences, see H. Heiber, Hitln LagebesprecAungen. Die Protokollftagernte seiner militarischen Konferenzen
    • 1942