• DOI:10.1080/0308514042000285251
• Corpus ID: 145227353

Travelling with vehicular ideas: The case of the third Way

@article{Mclennan2004TravellingWV,
  title={Travelling with vehicular ideas: The case of the third Way},
  author={Gregor Mclennan},
  journal={Economy and Society},
  year={2004},
  volume={33},
  pages={484 - 499}
}

• G. Mclennan
• Published 1 November 2004
• Sociology
• Economy and Society

In all the various debates around Anthony Giddens's Third Way sequence, few attempts have been made to characterize its logic and impact as a type of discourse, a certain mode of ideas-work. The first dimension of this paper involves deploying Thomas Osborne's categories to depict the Third Way as a ‘vehicular’ idea, with the intellectual style of Giddens himself correlatively framed as that of a new sort of ‘mediator’. In these terms, the essential inclusiveness and indeterminacy of the Third Way series of texts is illustrated, and the issue of what counts as ideas ‘success’ in the vehicular mode is broached. Second, in line with the inherent mobility of vehicular ideas, I identify the keynote shifts in Third Way thinking over time, including the sociological register that it occupies, its pragmatism and its relationship to New Labour politics. In a third phase, the article takes up questions about the role of the critical intellectual today and the practical, though not theoretical, recovery of ‘ideology-critique’ in appraising ideas like the Third Way. The scope and limits of the very notion of ‘vehicularity’ itself are central to this discussion.