Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial.


OBJECTIVE We sought to compare transumbilical (TU) and transvaginal (TV) route for retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy. STUDY DESIGN Women scheduled for a laparoscopic resection of an adnexal mass were randomized to have their surgical specimen removed either through a posterior colpotomy (n = 34) or the umbilical port site (n = 32). Group allocation was concealed from patients and bedside clinicians. The primary outcome was postoperative incisional pain assessed by a 10-cm visual analog scale at 1, 3, and 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS TV retrieval caused less postoperative pain than TU specimen extraction at each time point (visual analog scale score at 1 hour: 2.6 ± 2.9 vs 1.2 ± 2.0, P = .03; at 3 hours: 2.4 ± 2.0 vs 1.4 ± 2.0, P = .02; and at 24 hours: 1.1 ± 1.5 vs 0.5 ± 1.4, P = .02). A higher proportion of women in the TU group than in the TV group indicated the umbilicus as the most painful area at 1 and 3 hours postoperatively. Two months after surgery, the participants scored similarly as to their overall satisfaction, cosmetic outcome, and dyspareunia upon resumption of intercourse. CONCLUSION A TV approach for specimen removal after laparoscopic resection of adnexal masses offers the advantage of less postoperative pain than TU retrieval.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.016

3 Figures and Tables

Citations per Year

271 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 271 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Ghezzi2012TransumbilicalVT, title={Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial.}, author={Fabio Ghezzi and Antonella Cromi and Stefano Uccella and Giorgio Bogani and Maurizio Serati and Pierfrancesco Bolis}, journal={American journal of obstetrics and gynecology}, year={2012}, volume={207 2}, pages={112.e1-6} }