Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration

@article{Moons2015TransparentRO,
  title={Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration},
  author={Karel G. M. Moons and Douglas G. Altman and Johannes B. Reitsma and John P. A. Ioannidis and Petra Macaskill and Ewout Willem Steyerberg and Andrew Julian Vickers and David F. Ransohoff and Gary S. Collins},
  journal={Annals of Internal Medicine},
  year={2015},
  volume={162},
  pages={W1-W73}
}
In medicine, numerous decisions are made by care providers, often in shared decision making, on the basis of an estimated probability that a specific disease or condition is present (diagnostic setting) or a specific event will occur in the future (prognostic setting) in an individual. In the diagnostic setting, the probability that a particular disease is present can be used, for example, to inform the referral of patients for further testing, to initiate treatment directly, or to reassure… 
New guideline for the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model.
In medicine, patients and their care providers are confronted with making numerous decisions that are commonly, if not always, made on the basis of a probability—a probability that a specific disease
Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD)
TLDR
The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used and is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission.
Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
TLDR
The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used and is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission.
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.
TLDR
The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used, and is best used in conjunction with the TRIPod explanation and elaboration document.
Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
TLDR
The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used, and is best used in conjunction with the TRIPod explanation and elaboration document.
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
TLDR
The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used, and is best used in conjunction with the TRIPod explanation and elaboration document.
Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
TLDR
The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study, regardless of the study methods used, and is best used in conjunction with the TRIPod explanation and elaboration document.
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD)
TLDR
The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Statement concerns prediction models that are developed for diagnosis or prognosis and single-marker (biomarkers and prognostic factors) studies.
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
TLDR
The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Initiative developed a set of recommendations for the reporting of studies developing, validating or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 556 REFERENCES
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
TLDR
The nature of the prediction in diagnosis is estimating the probability that a specific outcome or disease is present (or absent) within an individual, at this point in timethat is, the moment of prediction (T= 0), and prognostic prediction involves a longitudinal relationship.
How to derive and validate clinical prediction models for use in intensive care medicine
TLDR
This narrative review introduces a checklist of 19 items designed to help intensivists develop and transparently report valid clinical prediction models.
Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models
  • A. Vickers, E. Elkin
  • Psychology
    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
  • 2006
TLDR
Decision curve analysis is a suitable method for evaluating alternative diagnostic and prognostic strategies that has advantages over other commonly used measures and techniques.
Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation.
TLDR
The validity of a prediction model is ideally assessed in fully independent data, where the proposed framework to strengthen the methodological rigour and quality for prediction models in cardiovascular research is proposed.
Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker.
TLDR
This second report in a series of 4 gives an overview of several methods to quantify the added value of a new diagnostic test or biomarker, including the area under the ROC curve, net reclassification improvement, integrated discrimination improvement, predictiveness curve, and decision curve analysis.
Prognostic Models: A Methodological Framework and Review of Models for Breast Cancer
TLDR
This chapter describes a review of published prognostic models that have been developed to predict the outcome of future breast cancer patients and identifies models for which there has been an evaluation of how successful the models have been when used in a different setting.
Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker
TLDR
This first article focuses on the different aspects of model development studies, from design to reporting, how to estimate a model's predictive performance and the potential optimism in these estimates using internal validation techniques, and how to quantify the added or incremental value of new predictors or biomarkers to existing predictors.
Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment
TLDR
An overview is provided of the consecutive steps for the assessment of the model's predictive performance in new individuals, how to adjust or update existing models to local circumstances or with new predictors, and how to investigate the impact of the uptake of prediction models on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes (impact studies).
Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review
TLDR
Many published prognostic models have been developed using poor methods and many with poor reporting, both of which compromise the reliability and clinical relevance of models, prognostic indices and risk groups derived from them.
Sample size for multivariable prognostic models
TLDR
This thesis investigates the issue of sample size in prognostic modelling, and develops calculations and recommendations which may improve prognostic study design, focusing on time-to-event data analysed with the Cox proportional hazards model.
...
...