• DOI:10.2307/2674420
• Corpus ID: 7096696

Transoceanic mortality: the slave trade in comparative perspective.

@article{Klein2001TransoceanicMT,
  title={Transoceanic mortality: the slave trade in comparative perspective.},
  author={Herbert S. Klein and Stanley L. Engerman and Robin F. Haines and Ralph Shlomowitz},
  journal={The William and Mary quarterly},
  year={2001},
  volume={58 1},
  pages={
          93-117
        }
}

• H. Klein, S. Engerman, +1 author R. Shlomowitz
• Published 2001
• History
• The William and Mary quarterly

EATH in the Middle Passage has long been at the center of the moral attack on slavery, and during the past two centuries estimates of the death rate and explanations of its magnitude have been repeatedly discussed and debated. For comparative purposes we draw on studies of mortality in other aspects of the movement of slaves from Africa to the Americas, as well as the experiences of passengers on other long-distance oceanic voyages.1 These comparisons will provide new interpretations as well as raise significant problems for the study of African, European, and American history. The transatlantic slave trade represented a major international movement of persons, and, although only one part of the movement of slaves from the point of enslavement in Africa to their place of forced labor in the Americas, shipboard mortality was its most conspicuous and frequently discussed aspect. Of the more than 27,000 voyages included in the Du Bois Institute dataset, more than 5,000 have information on shipboard mortality. Information is provided on African ports of embarkation; American ports of disembarkation; nationality of carrying vessels; numbers of slaves leaving Africa, arriving in the Americas, and dying in transit; ship size; numbers of crew and their mortality; and length of time at sea. The dataset also permits, with subsequent collecting, the linking of this information to government