Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice

  title={Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice},
  author={Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule},
  journal={Harvard Law Review},
Theorists of transitional justice study the transition measures used, or eschewed, by new democracies that succeed communist or authoritarian regimes - measures including trials, purges, lustration, reparations, and truth commissions. The theorists tend to oppose transitional measures, portraying them as illiberal and as a distraction from the task of consolidating new democracies. In this Article we argue against that view. The critics of transitional justice have gone wrong by overlooking… 

Tables from this paper

Re-Ordering Justice: Towards A New Methodological Approach to Studying Transitional Justice

Scholars and policymakers have turned increasing attention to questions of transitional justice, those legal responses to a former regime’s repressive acts following a change in political systems.

Reassessing the Boundaries of Transitional Justice: An Inquiry on Political Transitions, Armed Conflicts, and Human Rights Violations

This chapter proposes a reappraisal of transitional justice through the study of the nature and function of the rule of law it conveys. As originally conceived, transitional justice embraces a

Transitional justice: (re)conceptualising the field

Transitional justice discourse is generally accepted as having its foundations located in the theoretical, policy and practical implications of dealing with past human rights violations in societies

Foreword: Transitional Justice: (Re)Conceptualizing the Field

Transitional justice discourse is generally accepted as having its foundations located in the theoretical, policy and practical implications of dealing with past human rights violations in societies

Religion & Transitional Justice

Transitional justice refers to the process of dealing with human rights abuses committed during the course of ongoing conflict or repression, where such processes are established as a society aims to

Transitional Justice: A Conceptual Map

The term “transitional justice” refers to formal attempts by postrepressive or postconflict societies to address past wrongdoing in their efforts to democratize. I focus in this chapter on the

Transitional justice in settled democracies: Northern Ireland and the Basque Country in comparative perspective

ABSTRACT This article explores the concept of transitional justice in democratic states dealing with political violence. Although transitional justice was designed for paradigmatic transitions (from

The Vertical and Horizontal Expansion of Transitional Justice: Explanations and Implications for a Contested Field

The field of transitional justice has expanded significantly in recent years. Transitional justice is no longer exclusively, or even predominantly, discussed as a matter of whether and how the state

Justice Framed

Why are certain responses to past human rights violations considered instances of transitional justice while others are disregarded? This study interrogates the history of the discourse and practice

The Three R’s of Seeking Transitional Justice: Reparation, Responsibility, and Reframing in Canada and Argentina

In Canada an officially mandated truth commission inquiring into the forced assimilation and abuse of Indigenous children in state-organized and funded residential schools raises profound and in many



Lessons for the Future of Affirmative Action from the Past of the Religion Clauses?

For both educational affirmative action and the use of race in districting, this essay pursues parallels with the Supreme Court's religion clause jurisprudence in aid of the argument that the

Treaties, Human Rights, and Conditional Consent

The U.S. treaty-makers have consistently attached conditions to their consent to modern human rights treaties, in the form of reservations, understandings, and declarations ("RUDs"). Through these

The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory

Ambitious legal thinkers have become mesmerized by moral philosophy, believing that great figures in the philosophical tradition hold the keys to understanding and improving law and justice and even

Military Tribunals and Legal Culture: What a Difference Sixty Years Makes

President Bush's Military Order establishing Military Commissions was greeted with impassioned criticism in the press, the legal academy, and Congress. Sixty years earlier, in the midst of World War

The Principle and Practice of Women's 'Full Citizenship': A Case Study of Sex-Segregated Public Education

For more than a quarter century, the Supreme Court has repeatedly declared that sex-based state action is subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause. But the Court has always

Impeachment and Presidential Immunity from Judicial Process

The Lewinsky affair played out under ground rules shaped in the Watergate affair, an earlier episode involving misconduct by a President. A predicate of the impeachment of President Clinton was the

Is the Party Over? The Court and the Political Process

This article identifies and analyzes five features of political parties that make them among the most complex and dynamic of any political institution and therefore among the most difficult for the

Above the Law: Research Methods, Ethics, and the Law of Privilege

In Anticipating Law: Research Methods, Ethics and the Law of Privilege, -- J. Sociological Methodology -- (2002), Ted Palys and John Lowman set forth the rationale for a "researcher-participant

Why Does the American Constitution Lack Social and Economic Guarantees

Why does the American Constitution lack certain social and economic guarantees, which appear in most contemporary constitutions? This essay explores four possible answers: chronological, cultural,

Does Commerce Clause Review Have Perverse Effects

There is a crucial empirical assumption that pervades the debate about federal judicial review of federal statutes under the affirmative Commerce Clause. The assumption, indulged by many different