• Corpus ID: 153149070

Transforming nuclear deterrence

@inproceedings{Binnendijk1997TransformingND,
  title={Transforming nuclear deterrence},
  author={Hans Binnendijk and James E. Goodby},
  year={1997}
}

A Pillar of Salt: The Future of Nuclear Arms Control

Focuses on the need for nuclear disarmament. International treaties and agreements for a nuclear-free world; Limitations of conventional arms deterrence; Importance of building stability on

Not With Impunity: Assessing U.S. Policy for Retaliating to a Chemical or Biological Attack

Abstract : How should the United States determine its response to a chemical or biological attack against American personnel or interests? This paper assesses the current U,S reprisal policy known as

Nuclear Deterrence is Here to Stay

Abstract : In the most recent National Security Strategy President Bush has stated that deterrence doesn't work. The latest Nuclear Posture Review, completed in December 2001, proposed the tenets of

Nuclear Deterrence in the Third Millennium

Abstract : More than a decade after victory in Cold War, the U.S. continues to grapple with how best to structure its strategic nuclear forces and to reorient its deterrence policy in the post Cold

Future Global Nuclear Threats

s. In turn, these abstracts were entered into an MS Access database (provided to DTRA/ASCO). The database enables analysts to conduct searches by various means, such as country-by-country profile,

The Case for Unilateral Nuclear Force Reductions

Abstract : Since the end of the Cold War, the United States (U.S.) and Russia have made great strides in reducing their nuclear arsenals. The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) I reduced