Transforming evidence for policy: do we have the evidence generation house in order?

  title={Transforming evidence for policy: do we have the evidence generation house in order?},
  author={Ruth Stewart and Harsha Dayal and Laurenz Langer and Carina van Rooyen},
  journal={Humanities and Social Sciences Communications},
For decades, researchers, knowledge brokers and policymakers have been working to increase the use of evidence in policymaking. This has spanned a wide range of approaches, from developments in evidence generation, to efforts to increase demand amongst decision-makers, and everything in between. Policymakers are central in this process, and we have well documented examples of how the policy system in some countries is increasingly embedding evidence into routine decision-making processes. These… 


The evidence ecosystem in South Africa: growing resilience and institutionalisation of evidence use
The evidence-informed approach to policy-making and implementation is, at its core, about better decisions for a better future. It is focused on the effective use of scarce resources, on avoiding
Why do policies change? Institutions, interests, ideas and networks in three cases of policy reform.
It was found that while network changes were indeed associated with policy reform, this relationship was mediated by one or more of institutions, interests and ideas, which enabled the entry and dissemination of new ideas and shifts in the overall balance of interest power ultimately leading to policy change.
Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review
There is a significant gap between researchers’ production of evidence and its use by policymakers. Several knowledge transfer strategies have emerged in the past years to promote the use of
Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement
This paper argues for the importance of synthesis as a research exercise to clarify what is known from research evidence to inform policy, practice and personal decision making, and discusses core issues for research synthesis.
Feasibility of a rapid response mechanism to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems in a low income country: a case study
The feasibility of a rapid response mechanism designed to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems in a low income country, Uganda, is established and seems to increase confidence for policymakers involved in the policymaking process.
Research excellence in Africa : Policies, perceptions and performance
Our paper discusses various features of research excellence in Africa, framed within the context of African science granting councils and pan-African research excellence initiatives. Our survey,
A scoping review of the uses and institutionalisation of knowledge for health policy in low- and middle-income countries
This scoping review uses the Arskey and O’Malley framework to review the literature on knowledge utilisation in LMIC health systems, using eight public health and social science databases to identify normative dimensions of institutionalisation.
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
Timely access to good quality and relevant research evidence, collaborations with policymakers and relationship- and skills-building with policymakers are reported to be the most important factors in influencing the use of evidence.
An analysis of the strategic plan development processes of major public organisations funding health research in nine high-income countries worldwide
The governance of the health research sector would benefit from a traceable and standardised knowledge-based process of health research strategic planning, which would provide an opportunity to demonstrate responsible budget stewardship and, more importantly, to make efforts to remain responsive to healthcare challenges, research gaps and opportunities.