Tractarian nominalism

@article{Skyrms1981TractarianN,
  title={Tractarian nominalism},
  author={Brian Skyrms},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
  year={1981},
  volume={40},
  pages={199-206}
}
  • B. Skyrms
  • Published 1 September 1981
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Studies
Economical Unification as a Method of Philosophical Analysis
thing: a thought realized in a human mind. All thoughts do not have to be abstract but all abstract things are thoughts, and all thoughts are mental. Whenever an abstract thing (or an abstract idea)
A New Argument for the Groundedness of Grounding Facts
Many philosophers have recently been impressed by an argument to the effect that all grounding facts about “derivative entities”—e.g. the facts expressed by the (let us suppose) true sentences ‘the
Meaning and mapping : Sellars on predication and representation
Wilfrid Sellars (1912-1989) developed a broadly deflationary, non-relational analysis of traditional semantic vocabulary. However, Sellars also developed a broadly inflationary, “correspondence”
Fictional Possibilities Grounded in Foundational Nominalism
David Armstrong in his A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility proposes that non-actual possibilities may be treated as fictions grounded in instantiated universals. In this paper, I first provide some
Supertropestantivalism
According to the identity version of spacetime supersubstantivalism, material objects are numerically identical to spacetime regions. While the view has been commended for its parsimony and
Dualism About Possible Worlds
Dualism about possible worlds says that merely possible worlds aren’t concrete objects, but the actual world is concrete. This view seems to be the natural one for ersatzers about merely possible
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES
Whither Physical Objects
TLDR
A physical object is understood, for a while, simply as the aggregate material content of any portion of space-time, however ragged and discontinuous.
Completeness in the Theory of Types
  • L. Henkin
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
    J. Symb. Log.
  • 1950
TLDR
This proof demonstrates that each formula of the calculus is a formal theorem which becomes a true sentence under every one of a certain intended class of interpretations of the formal system.
Steps Toward a Constructive Nominalism
TLDR
Any system that countenances abstract entities the authors deem unsatisfactory as a final philosophy are renounced altogether.