Corpus ID: 237940098

Towards a Theory of Bullshit Visualization

@article{Correll2021TowardsAT,
  title={Towards a Theory of Bullshit Visualization},
  author={Michael Correll},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2021},
  volume={abs/2109.12975}
}
  • M. Correll
  • Published 23 September 2021
  • Computer Science
  • ArXiv
In this unhinged rant, I lay out my suspicion that a lot of visualizations are bullshit: charts that do not have even the common decency to intentionally lie but are totally unconcerned about the state of the world or any practical utility. I suspect that bullshit charts take up a large fraction of the time and attention of actual visualization producers and consumers, and yet are seemingly absent from academic research into visualization design. 

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
Black Hat Visualization
TLDR
The language of computer security is used to expand the space of ways that unscrupulous people (black hats) can manipulate visualizations for nefarious ends and encourages designers to think defensively and comprehensively about how their visual designs can result in data being misinterpreted. Expand
How Deceptive are Deceptive Visualizations?: An Empirical Analysis of Common Distortion Techniques
TLDR
An in-depth analysis of what deception means in the context of data visualization, and categorize deceptive visualizations based on the type of deception they lead to, and formalize why deception occurs with those distortions. Expand
Data is Personal: Attitudes and Perceptions of Data Visualization in Rural Pennsylvania
TLDR
It is found that a complex set of factors intermix to inform attitudes and perceptions about data visualization - including educational background, political affiliation, and personal experience. Expand
Skipping the Replication Crisis in Visualization: Threats to Study Validity and How to Address Them : Position Paper
  • R. Kosara, Steve Haroz
  • Computer Science
  • 2018 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV)
  • 2018
TLDR
This paper examines six threats to the validity of studies in visualization and suggests ways to address them and describes possible models for publishing replications that satisfy the novelty criterion that can keep replications from being accepted. Expand
Testing the Susceptibility of Users to Deceptive Data Visualizations When Paired with Explanatory Text
TLDR
The results of the study confirmed that deceptive techniques in data visualizations caused participants to misinterpret the information in the deceptive dataVisualizations even when they were accompanied by accurate explanatory text. Expand
What Makes a Visualization Memorable?
TLDR
The largest scale visualization study to date, using 2,070 single-panel visualizations, suggests that quantifying memorability is a general metric of the utility of information, an essential step towards determining how to design effective visualizations. Expand
Truncating the Y-Axis: Threat or Menace?
TLDR
It is found that the subjective impact of axis truncation is persistent across visualizations designs, even for designs with explicit visual cues that indicate truncation has taken place. Expand
Investigating the Effect of the Multiple Comparisons Problem in Visual Analysis
TLDR
It is shown how a confirmatory analysis approach that accounts for all visual comparisons, insights and non-insights, can achieve similar results as one that requires a validation dataset. Expand
An Algebraic Process for Visualization Design
We present a model of visualization design based on algebraic considerations of the visualization process. The model helps characterize visual encodings, guide their design, evaluate theirExpand
Argument and Authority in the Visual Representations of Science
The focus of workplace communication research on visual rhetoric has tended to be the efficient and unproblematically "effective" functioning of visual texts. By suggesting ways in which the visualExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...