Towards Discipline-Independent Argumentative Zoning: Evidence from Chemistry and Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Argumentative Zoning (AZ) is an analysis of the argumentative and rhetorical structure of a scientific paper. It has been shown to be reliably used by independent human coders, and has proven useful for various information access tasks. Annotation experiments have however so far been restricted to one discipline, computational linguistics (CL). Here, we present a more informative AZ scheme with 15 categories in place of the original 7, and show that it can be applied to the life sciences as well as to CL. We use a domain expert to encode basic knowledge about the subject (such as terminology and domain specific rules for individual categories) as part of the annotation guidelines. Our results show that non-expert human coders can then use these guidelines to reliably annotate this scheme in two domains, chemistry and computational linguistics.

4 Figures and Tables

05101520102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

77 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 77 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Teufel2009TowardsDA, title={Towards Discipline-Independent Argumentative Zoning: Evidence from Chemistry and Computational Linguistics}, author={Simone Teufel and Advaith Siddharthan and Colin R. Batchelor}, year={2009} }