Toward an Epistemologically-Relevant Sociology of Science*

@article{Campbell1985TowardAE,
  title={Toward an Epistemologically-Relevant Sociology of Science*},
  author={Donald T. Campbell},
  journal={Science, Technology, \& Human Values},
  year={1985},
  volume={10},
  pages={38 - 48}
}
  • D. Campbell
  • Published 1 January 1985
  • Education
  • Science, Technology, & Human Values
Donald Campbell: I would have liked to have presented here, for your critical comments, a welldeveloped social theory of how science works when science is successfully improving scientific beliefs. I will refer to such a theory as an epistemologicallyrelevant sociology of science, even though no such theory is available. The people who are most assiduously studying the sociology of science are reluctant to add this policy-relevant domain to their task, primarily because they, along with most… 

Toward a Campbellian Realist Organization Science

Campbell’s search for resolution drove him to become a “critical, hypothetical, corrigible scientific realist” (1988b, p. 444−445). And as he himself admitted many times and as his work suggests so

Useful sociology: can sociological knowledge be valuable in policy‐making?

Delves into history to find out if sociological knowledge can be applied successfully to policy making. Explains that society is based on the use of multiple knowledge structures and belief systems.

Campbell, Donald (1916–96)

Trained as a social psychologist, Donald Campbell (1916–96) became the premier research methodologist of the social sciences and a proponent of social reform through the mechanism of “experimenting

Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings.

This article compares Donald Campbell's and Donald Rubin's work on causal inference in field settings on issues of epistemology, theories of cause and effect, methodology, statistics, generalization,

Building Policy-Related Technical Communities

The development of valid and useful social science requires social structures different from those of basic disciplines and departments. One such structure is a "technical community"; whereas a basic

Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery

TLDR
A mathematical model of scientific discovery that combines hypothesis formation, replication, publication bias, and variation in research quality is developed and it is found that communication of negative replications may aid true discovery even when attempts to replicate have diminished power.

Evaluating Knowledge Production Systems in Security Studies and Health Sciences: Citation Network Analysis

TLDR
A generalizable normative index is developed based on Campbell’s epistemologically relevant internalist sociology of science and Gibbons et al. (1994) model of knowledge production and used to evaluate research production systems in health sciences and security studies.

Beneficial Action within Altruistic and Prosocial Behavior

This article integrates knowledge from health psychology, life course development, and social psychology to outline a theoretical framework for identifying, investigating, promoting, and evaluating

Postpositivist critical realism: philosophy, methodology and method for nursing research.

  • G. Ryan
  • Medicine
    Nurse researcher
  • 2019
TLDR
Postpositivism negotiates some of the conflict and differences between positivism and interpretivism and offers a variety of methodological choices for nurses who do not wish to align themselves only with facts, cause and effect, proving hypotheses, or the perspectives and experiences of participants.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted,

Revolution in Science: The 1919 Eclipse Test of General Relativity

“REVOLUTION IN SCIENCE/NEW THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE/NEWTONIAN IDEAS OVERTHROWN.”1 These were headlines in the Times of London on Friday, Nov. 7, 1919. Here the Times reported the extraordinary joint

Justification of a ’’crucial’’ experiment: parity nonconservation

In a recent paper it was argued that the 1957 experiments on parity nonconservation were ’’crucial’’ experiments in the sense that they decided unambiguously and within a short period of time for the

Sociology of Science

The Social Process of Innovation.By M. J. Mulkay. Pp. 64. (Macmillan: London and Basingstoke, April 1972.) 60p.

Chance and consensus in peer review.

An experiment in which 150 proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation were evaluated independently by a new set of reviewers indicates that getting a research grant depends to a

Papers from these two workshops are available from the Division of Policy Research and Analysis, National Science Foundation

    With an introduction by

    • 1973

    Sociologyof Science (Chicago, IL: Um~erslty of Chicago Press, 1973). With an introduction by Norman W

    • 1973