Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies

  title={Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies},
  author={Jennifer McCoy and Murat Somer},
  journal={The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  pages={234 - 271}
This article compares the dynamics of polarization in the eleven case studies analyzed in this special issue to draw conclusions about antecedents of severe political and societal polarization, the characteristics and mechanisms of such polarization, and consequences of severe polarization for democracy. We find that the emergence of pernicious polarization (when a society is split into mutually distrustful “Us vs. Them” camps) is not attributable to any specific underlying social or political… Expand

Tables from this paper

Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies
ABSTRACT “Pernicious polarization” – the division of society into mutually distrustful Us versus Them camps in which political identity becomes a social identity – fosters autocratization byExpand
United we stand, divided we rule: how political polarization erodes democracy
ABSTRACT Although there is a broad consensus among political scientists that polarization is detrimental to democracy, very few empirically investigate the links between political polarization andExpand
Populism and Polarization in Comparative Perspective: Constitutive, Spatial and Institutional Dimensions
Polarization may be the most consistent effect of populism, as it is integral to the logic of constructing populist subjects. This article distinguishes between constitutive, spatial andExpand
How Ideology , Economics and Institutions Shape Affective Polarization in Democratic Polities
While many studies analyze affective polarization in the US public, i.e., partisan voters’ tendencies to dislike the out-party, we lack comparative knowledge about the factors that intensifyExpand
Populism’s Threat to Democracy: Comparative Lessons for the United States
How grave is the threat that populist leaders pose to democracy? To elucidate the prospects of the United States under president Donald Trump, I conduct a wide-ranging comparative analysis ofExpand
Presidency of Donald Trump and American Democracy: Populist Messages, Political Sectarianism, and Negative Partisanship
In this article, the following three subjects are identified: (1) as the quantitative evidence shows in the first section of this article, democracy in the US has deteriorated since 2016; (2) thereExpand
Talking with the right-wing: Pernicious polarization in Brazil and the philosophy of Paulo Freire
The last decade has witnessed the development of pernicious polarization in Brazil, partly due to the emergence of right-wing organizations promoting a conservative, populist-nationalist andExpand
Democratic regression in comparative perspective: scope, methods, and causes
ABSTRACT Between 1974 and 2005, a majority of states became democratic for the first time in history. However, a global democratic recession began in 2006 and has persisted – and deepened – over theExpand
Resilience of democracies: responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges
ABSTRACT Illiberalism and authoritarianism have become major threats to democracy across the world. In response to this development, research on the causes and processes of democratic declines hasExpand
Disrupting the autocratization sequence: towards democratic resilience
ABSTRACT Contemporary autocratization is typically the result of a long sequence of events and gradual processes. How can democratic actors disrupt such autocratization sequences in order to enhanceExpand


Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities
This article argues that a common pattern and set of dynamics characterizes severe political and societal polarization in different contexts around the world, with pernicious consequences forExpand
Déjà vu? Polarization and Endangered Democracies in the 21st Century
As political and societal polarization deepens, democracies are under stress around the world. This article examines the complex relationship and causal direction between democracy and polarizationExpand
Paradoxes of Polarization: Democracy’s Inherent Division and the (Anti-) Populist Challenge
This article carries out a theoretical analysis of the relationship between democracy and polarization. It utilizes examples from a variety of premodern and modern societies to argue that differenceExpand
The Logic of Polarizing Populism: State Crises and Polarization in South America
What explains high party polarization in younger developing democracies? This article examines and explains variation during South America’s recent left turn period, making two key claims. ExtremelyExpand
Can Polarization Be Positive? Conflict and Institutional Development in Africa
Can political polarization, typically viewed as detrimental for political development, have positive effects on institution-building and democratization in the long run? This article argues that theExpand
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
Competition is a defining element of democracy. One of the most noteworthy events over the last quarter-century in U.S. politics is the change in the nature of elite party competition: The partiesExpand
Polarizing Figures: Executive Power and Institutional Conflict in Asian Democracies
Polarization does not necessarily pit left against right, rich against poor, secular against religious, or ethnicity against ethnicity. Rather than polarizing along deep social or ideologicalExpand
The role of agency in cleavage formation
Through the analysis of Hungarian politics, this article demonstrates how parties become embedded in the social, cognitive and emotive structures of societies. The role of agency in cleavageExpand
The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction
Scholars often assume that some issues globally evoke moral reactions, whether these issues are presented as moral dilemmas (e.g., trolley problems) or as controversial issues of the day (e.g., theExpand
Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote
  • Diana C. Mutz
  • Political Science, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2018
It is found that change in financial wellbeing had little impact on candidate preference in 2016, and status threat felt by the dwindling proportion of traditionally high-status Americans as well as by those who perceive America’s global dominance as threatened combined to increase support for the candidate who emphasized reestablishing status hierarchies of the past. Expand