Torricelli's Infinitely Long Solid and Its Philosophical Reception in the Seventeenth Century

@article{Mancosu1991TorricellisIL,
  title={Torricelli's Infinitely Long Solid and Its Philosophical Reception in the Seventeenth Century},
  author={Paolo Mancosu and Ezio Vailati},
  journal={Isis},
  year={1991},
  volume={82},
  pages={50 - 70}
}
IN 1641 EVANGELISTA TORRICELLI discovered that a certain solid of infinite length, which he called the "acute hyperbolic solid," has a finite volume. This paradoxical result created considerable interest in mathematical and philosophical circles around the third quarter of the seventeenth century. The result seemed so counterintuitive and astonishing that at first some of the leading mathematicians thought it impossible; even eighty years later Bernard de Fontenelle commented, "One apparently… Expand
Infinity and creation: the origin of the controversy between Thomas Hobbes and the Savilian professors Seth Ward and John Wallis
Until recently, historians of mathematics usually agreed in refusing to consider the numerous geometrical publications of Thomas Hobbes as a contribution to the development of mathematics in theExpand
The Paradoxes of Matter
In the first day of his Discourses and Mathematical Demonstrations Relating to Two New Sciences, Galileo illustrates the theme of the ‘first new science,’ which concerns the ‘resistance which solidExpand
Radical mathematical Thomism: beings of reason and divine decrees in Torricelli’s philosophy of mathematics
Abstract Evangelista Torricelli (1608–1647) is perhaps best known for being the most gifted of Galileo’s pupils, and for his works based on indivisibles, especially his stunning cubature of anExpand
Wallis on Indivisibles
The present chapter is devoted, first, to discuss in detail the structure and results of Wallis's major and most influential mathematical work, the Arithmetica Infinitorum ([51]). Next we will reviseExpand
What Exactly Was Torricelli’s “Barometer?”
What exactly was Evangelista Torricelli up to when, in 1644, he took mercury filled tubes and turned them upside down in other mercury filled tubs? A canonical story anchored by the largerExpand
MEASURING THE SIZE OF INFINITE COLLECTIONS OF NATURAL NUMBERS: WAS CANTOR’S THEORY OF INFINITE NUMBER INEVITABLE?
  • P. Mancosu
  • Computer Science, Mathematics
  • The Review of Symbolic Logic
  • 2009
TLDR
This article reviewing the contributions of some thinkers who argued in favor of the assignment of different sizes to infinite collections of natural numbers and some recent mathematical developments that generalize the part–whole principle to infinite sets in a coherent fashion show how these new developments are important for a proper evaluation of a number of positions in philosophy of mathematics. Expand
On Painter’s Paradox: Contextual and Mathematical Approaches to Infinity
In mathematics education research paradoxes of infinity have been used in the investigation of students’ conceptions of infinity. We analyze one such paradox – the Painter’s Paradox – and examine theExpand
Catholicism and Mathematics in the Early Modernity
This text discusses certain aspects of the efforts made by several clergymen of the Roman Catholic Church to produce, disseminate and teach mathematics, especially during the seventeenth century.Expand
Leibniz, Philosopher Mathematician and Mathematical Philosopher
Like no other philosopher in his time, Leibniz was concerned to develop a metaphysics which could provide an intellectually rigorous account of the success of the mathematical sciences in harnessingExpand
The Method of Archimedes in the Seventeenth Century
TLDR
The historical precursors to this rediscovery of Archimedes’ quadrature formula are looked at, and the two proofs are compared. Expand
...
1
2
3
...