Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force

@article{Thomas2018ToddlersPT,
  title={Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force},
  author={Ashley J. Thomas and Lotte Thomsen and Angela F. Lukowski and Meline Abramyan and Barbara W. Sarnecka},
  journal={Nature Human Behaviour},
  year={2018},
  volume={2},
  pages={662-669}
}
Social hierarchies occur across human societies, so all humans must navigate them. Infants can detect when one individual outranks another1–3, but it is unknown whether they approach others based on their social status. This paper presents a series of seven experiments investigating whether toddlers prefer high- or low-ranking individuals. Toddlers aged 21–31 months watched a zero-sum, right-of-way conflict between two puppets, in which one puppet ‘won’ because the other yielded the way. Of the… 
How do toddlers evaluate defensive actions toward third parties?
  • A. Geraci
  • Psychology
    Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
  • 2020
TLDR
The results support the developmental stability and provide evidence of a rich and well-organized prosociality that before the second year of life proves to be based on some moral principles and linked with a sophisticated psychological reasoning.
Children’s Developing Judgments About the Physical Manifestations of Power
TLDR
This study documents several novel developmental patterns that generate new hypotheses about the mechanisms that support the emergence of children’s intuitions about powerful appearances and investigates the developmental origins and conceptual structure of power judgments based on physical appearance.
Infants expect leaders to right wrongs
TLDR
By the second year of life, infants thus already ascribe unique responsibilities to leaders, including that of righting wrongs, consistent with claims that abstract expectations about leaders’ responsibilities are part of the human endowment.
Preverbal infants expect agents exhibiting counterintuitive capacities to gain access to contested resources
TLDR
It is shown that 12- to 16-month-old infants expect agents exhibiting counterintuitive capacities to win out in a two-way standoff over a contested resource, suggesting that the link between supernatural power and worldly authority has early origins in development.
The boss is not always right: Norwegian preschoolers do not selectively endorse the testimony of a novel dominant agent.
TLDR
It is shown that 249 three- to six-year-olds randomly endorsed the word-labels of dominant and subordinate agents in the egalitarian culture of Norway, using stimuli which solicit dominance inferences among infants and manipulating anonymity across studies to control for egalitarian desirability bias.
Children’s social evaluation toward prestige-based and dominance-based powerholders
Objective Social scientists have suggested two typical ways of acquiring social power: dominance approach (gaining social power by applying violence, coercion, threat, and punishment) and prestige
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES
Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies
  • J. Silk
  • Psychology
    Animal Behaviour
  • 1999
TLDR
It is shown that male bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata, use information about third-party rank relationships when they recruit support from other males, and consistently chose allies that outranked themselves and their opponents.
Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants
TLDR
Infants’ demonstrated understanding of social dominance reflects the cognitive underpinning of humans’ capacity to represent social relations, which may be evolutionarily ancient, and may be shared with nonhuman species.
Fish can infer social rank by observation alone
TLDR
It is shown that male fish (Astatotilapia burtoni) can successfully make inferences on a hierarchy implied by pairwise fights between rival males, and that a universal mechanism underlying TI is unlikely.
Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance
TLDR
It is shown that infants as young as 6 mo of age are capable of detecting dominance relations when provided with an ecologically relevant cue such as social group size, and infants can infer the social dominance relationship between two competing individuals based on the size of the group to which they belong, and expect individuals from a numerically larger group to get their way.
Not So Innocent
TLDR
It is found that toddlers can use the time and effort associated with goal-directed actions to distinguish agents, and that children prefer agents who incur fewer costs in completing a goal.
Big and Mighty: Preverbal Infants Mentally Represent Social Dominance
TLDR
The results suggest that preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance and use a cue that covaries with it phylogenetically, and marks it metaphorically across human cultures and languages, to predict which of two agents is likely to prevail in a conflict of goals.
Social evaluation by preverbal infants
TLDR
It is shown that 6- and 10-month-old infants take into account an individual’s actions towards others in evaluating that individual as appealing or aversive: infants prefer an individual who helps another to one who hinders another, prefer a helping individual to a neutral individual, and prefer a neutralindividual to a hindering individual.
Dominance Acquisition During Mammalian Social Development: The “Inheritance” of Maternal Rank
TLDR
This work examines maternal rank “inheritance” (MRI) in those mammals for which maternal rank is the primary determinant of female rank, and concludes that youngsters appear to learn their ranks from direct aggression against them by higher-ranking adults.
...
...