Tobacco industry manipulation of research.

@article{Bero2005TobaccoIM,
  title={Tobacco industry manipulation of research.},
  author={Lisa A. Bero},
  journal={Public health reports},
  year={2005},
  volume={120 2},
  pages={
          200-8
        }
}
  • L. Bero
  • Published 1 March 2005
  • Medicine
  • Public health reports
Research findings provide the basis for estimates of risk. However, research findings or “facts” are subject to interpretation and to the social construction of the evidence.1 Research evidence has a context. The roles of framing, problem definition, and choice of language influence risk communication.2 Since data do not “speak for themselves,” interest groups can play a critical role in creating and communicating the research evidence on risk. An interest group is an organized group with a… Expand

Tables and Topics from this paper

Informed choice and the nanny state: learning from the tobacco industry.
  • J. Hoek
  • Business, Medicine
  • Public health
  • 2015
TLDR
The 'nanny state' arguments used by tobacco companies are examined to explore the cognitive biases that impede smokers' ability to make fully informed choices, and the implications for those working to limit the harmful effects of other risk products are analysed. Expand
Ten tips for spotting industry involvement in science policy
  • L. Bero
  • Political Science, Medicine
  • Tobacco Control
  • 2018
TLDR
Analysis of the development of the Brussels Declaration on ethics and principles for science and society policy-making shows that it ‘fails to address the need for safeguards to protect the integrity of science or policy from corporate interests’. Expand
Arguing about smoking bans: the role of evidence in the social construction of conflicting policy ideas
ABSTRACT The theory of discursive institutionalism requires support from empirical work. This article analyzes how evidence is used in conflicting ideas about smoking bans and how socialExpand
Bias in the use of evidence for policy: ‘technical bias’ and ‘issue bias’
Advocates of evidence-based policymaking (EBP) often argue that policy decisions are improved when they are informed by rigorous and accurate scientific evidence. However, some critical authors argueExpand
Tobacco Policy Influence on Denormalisation of Smoking
The social norms concept provides a fresh basis for thinking about how public health policies and campaigns impact health behaviour. Social norms offer much promise to the field of public health,Expand
"A delicate diplomatic situation": tobacco industry efforts to gain control of the Framingham Study.
TLDR
This study sought to understand the tobacco industry's motivation and activities in funding Framingham and analyzed previously undisclosed tobacco industry documents, conducting iterative searches of the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library and assembling a historical case study. Expand
Ethics, Industry, and Outcomes
  • A. Merry
  • Medicine
  • Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
  • 2008
TLDR
The history of influence in research related to tobacco is illuminating in this regard, and the ways in which influence can be exerted over the production and publication of evidence are understood. Expand
Reassessing policy paradigms: A comparison of the global tobacco and alcohol industries
TLDR
The extensive similarities which exist between the tobacco and alcohol industries in terms of market structure and strategy, and political strategy, call into question the rationale for both the relatively weak regulatory approach taken towards alcohol, and the continued participation of alcohol corporations in policy-making processes. Expand
An international study of tobacco and alcohol marketing policy : industry influence and compliance
Tobacco and alcohol are responsible for an estimated 12.5% of global deaths, a percentage which is set to rise. Evidence shows that tobacco and alcohol industry marketing influences smoking andExpand
‘The industry must be inconspicuous’: Japan Tobacco’s corruption of science and health policy via the Smoking Research Foundation
TLDR
Investigating how and why Japan Tobacco, Inc. established the Smoking Research Foundation (SRF), a research-funding institution, and the extent to which SRF has influenced science and health policy in Japan found that contrary to industry claims, SRF was never meant to be independent or neutral. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 137 REFERENCES
Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy.
  • L. Bero
  • Business, Medicine
  • Annual review of public health
  • 2003
TLDR
The methodological challenges related to locating and analyzing an enormous number of poorly indexed documents are described and the implications of tobacco document research for public health and the application of such research to fields other than tobacco control are discussed. Expand
Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions
TLDR
Advocates can support health related regulations by submitting commentary emphasising the sound research base for regulation and countering criticisms of research, to avoid duplication of effort and make more efficient use of limited public health resources. Expand
Lawyer control of the tobacco industry's external research program. The Brown and Williamson documents.
TLDR
The involvement of tobacco industry lawyers in the selection of scientific projects to be funded is in sharp contrast to the industry's public statements about its review process for its external research program. Expand
Second hand smoke and risk assessment: what was in it for the tobacco industry?
TLDR
The tobacco industry developed a well coordinated, multi-pronged strategy to create doubt about research on exposure to SHS by trying to link it to the broader discussion of risk assessment of low doses of a number of toxins whose disease burden may still be a matter of scientific debate. Expand
Framing Processes in Public Commentary on US Federal Tobacco Control Regulation
TLDR
A US Food and Drug Administration regulation, proposed in 1995, to restrict the promotion and sale of tobacco products to minors is examined, revealing a significant disparity between the FDA's emphasis on scientific evidence and the commentators' emphases on political and ideological frames. Expand
Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding
TLDR
A case study in this issue of the journal shows that even internationally renowned scientists are not immune to the seductions of industry funding, and credibility is perhaps the most desired scientific product for tobacco industry funded research. Expand
Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development
TLDR
There is an important role for tobacco control advocates in the policy development process in regulatory agencies and policy makers suggested that Tobacco control advocates should present science in a format that is well organised and easily absorbed. Expand
Publication bias and public health policy on environmental tobacco smoke.
TLDR
There is no publication bias against statistically nonsignificant results on ETS in the peer-reviewed literature, and the high proportion of articles in symposia that reach the conclusion that ETS is not harmful primarily results from the inclusion of review articles. Expand
Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the “Latin Project”
TLDR
The strategies used by the industry have been successful in hindering development of public health programmes on secondhand smoke and Latin American health professionals need to be aware of this industry involvement and take steps to counter it. Expand
Evaluating public commentary and scientific evidence submitted in the development of a risk assessment.
  • Marieka Schotland, L. Bero
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
  • 2002
TLDR
Critics and supporters of the risk assessment used different criteria to evaluate the scientific evidence, suggesting that they were socially constructing the evidence to support their positions. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...