To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems

@article{Harvey2011ToTO,
  title={To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems},
  author={Catherine Harvey and Neville A. Stanton and Carl A. Pickering and Mike McDonald and Pengjun Zheng},
  journal={Ergonomics},
  year={2011},
  volume={54},
  pages={609 - 625}
}
In-vehicle information systems (IVIS) can be controlled by the user via direct or indirect input devices. In order to develop the next generation of usable IVIS, designers need to be able to evaluate and understand the usability issues associated with these two input types. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a set of empirical usability evaluation methods for identifying important usability issues and distinguishing between the IVIS input devices. A number of… 
To twist, roll, stroke or poke? A study of input devices for menu navigation in the cockpit
TLDR
The findings showed that no single input device produced consistently high performance scores across all of the variables evaluated, and the touch screen produced the largest number of ‘best’ scores.
How to make large touch screens usable while driving
TLDR
It is argued that there are ways to make large screens more appropriate for in-car usage and thus harness the advantages they provide in other aspects as well as investigate the required visual attention and task performance in comparison to a state-of-the-art multifunctional controller.
A study of input devices for menu navigation in the cockpit
TLDR
The findings show that a touch screen interface produced the shortest task times; however discomfort ratings for this device were high, highlighting the need for a thorough understanding of the task environment in order to support decisions for novel interaction styles in the cockpit.
In-Vehicle Touchscreen Interaction: Can a Head-Down Display Give a Heads-Up on Obstacles on the Road?
TLDR
A novel approach to possibly make the use of in-vehicle touchscreens safer, by displaying the road ahead directly above a touchscreen-based IVIS, may allow the driver to keep the road in his field of vision through the head-down display (HDD) during IVIS interaction.
EXPLORING USABILITY OF VARIOUS TOUCH GESTURE INTOUCH SCREEN IVIS USING PAPER PROTOTYPE
TLDR
The result of the usability test showed that the system applying various touch gesture is easy to use, will be easy to learn for most people, is not cumbersome, and not much learning is needed to be able to use this system.
Could You Please ... ? Investigating Cooperation In The Car
TLDR
A system to support driver-passenger cooperation is developed and the effect on perceived control and involvement is investigated and it is found that, depending on the person who is executing the task, the respective person feels more involved in the situation.
What you see is what you touch: visualizing touch screen interaction in the head-up display
TLDR
Several variations of a concept called "What You See Is What You Touch" (WYSIWYT) are proposed, which allows touch screen interaction without removing one's eyes from the road, within the car's head-up display (HUD).
You've Got the Look: Visualizing Infotainment Shortcuts in Head-Mounted Displays
TLDR
An infotainment system specifically designed to be displayed in an HMD was built, and it was found that horizontal gesture interaction significantly influenced the quality of lane keeping and input modality.
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 94 REFERENCES
Context of use as a factor in determining the usability of in-vehicle devices
TLDR
The aim of this review is to define usability for in-vehicle devices by selecting a set of criteria to describe the various factors which contribute to usability in this specific context of use.
Touch a Screen or Turn a Knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job
TLDR
Assessment of task demands and user age influenced task performance for a direct input device (touch screen) and an indirectinput device (rotary encoder) and guidance for the optimal selection of input devices for different user populations and task characteristics is provided.
The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing
TLDR
The findings obtained for visual attention and task engagement suggest that medium fidelity simulation provides a safe and effective means to evaluate the effects of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) designs on these categories of driver behaviour.
Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces
TLDR
A first design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces that allows a comprehensive description of input and output devices in a car with regard to placement and modality is introduced.
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR SAFETY OF IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
These design guidelines are based on current understanding of ergonomic good practice and cover many issues that need to be considered when designing and evaluating in-vehicle information systems
Usability Evaluation In Industry
TLDR
Issues relating to usability evaluation: performance measurement and ecological evaluation seminar discussions - issues for usability evaluation in industry.
Chapter 55 – Pointing Devices
Inventory of In-Vehicle Technology Human Factors Design Characteristics
A review and inventory of in-vehicle Telematics devices was conducted in order to better understand the current state of practice and trends relating to their design and implementation. The review
...
1
2
3
4
5
...