• DOI:10.1080/10357718.2016.1258689
• Corpus ID: 157488844

Timor-Leste’s foreign policy approach to the Timor Sea disputes: pipeline or pipe dream?

@article{Strating2017TimorLestesFP,
  title={Timor-Leste’s foreign policy approach to the Timor Sea disputes: pipeline or pipe dream?},
  author={Rebecca Strating},
  journal={Australian Journal of International Affairs},
  year={2017},
  volume={71},
  pages={259 - 283}
}

• Rebecca Strating
• Published 4 May 2017
• Political Science
• Australian Journal of International Affairs

ABSTRACT Over recent years, Australia and Timor-Leste’s bilateral relationship has been consumed by contested maritime boundary claims in the resource-rich Timor Sea. Intractable disagreements over the right to build a petroleum export pipeline have led Timor-Leste to reinvigorate its pursuit of permanent maritime boundaries as ‘a national priority’. This article examines Timor-Leste’s interests in the Timor Sea and assesses its strategies for achieving its foreign policy goals. It argues that Timor-Leste’s attainment of its stated goals relies on Australia shifting its Timor Sea policy, which has been largely consistent since the 1970s. Timor-Leste’s key strategy is a public diplomacy campaign that positions permanent maritime boundaries as the final stage of its independence struggle, and presents Timor-Leste as owning the disputed Greater Sunrise gas field under international law. While the public diplomacy campaign aims to win enough Australian ‘hearts and minds’ to put pressure on the Australian government, it ultimately fails to negotiate the strategic and historical realities of the interests that define Australia’s realpolitik approach to the Timor Sea.