Threats may be negative promises (but warnings are more than negative tips)

  title={Threats may be negative promises (but warnings are more than negative tips)},
  author={Helena Wray and Jeffrey S. Wood and Matthew Haigh and Andrew J Stewart},
  journal={Journal of Cognitive Psychology},
  pages={593 - 600}
ABSTRACT In everyday situations conditional promises, threats, tips, and warnings are commonplace. Previous research has reported disruption to eye movements during reading when conditional promises are produced by someone who does not have control over the conditional outcome event, but no such disruption for the processing of conditional tips. In the present paper, we examine how readers process conditional threats and warnings. We compare one account which views conditional threats and… Expand
Advice conditionals about tips and warnings: interpretations and inferences
ABSTRACT Two experiments examine how people interpret and reason about advice conditionals, such as tips, for example, “if you study more your grades will improve”, and warnings, for example, “if youExpand
An Eye-Tracking Examination of Readers’ Sensitivity to Pragmatic Scope Information During the Processing of Conditional Inducements
The results suggest that readers are sensitive during reading of the conditional itself to pragmatic scope differences between “threats” and “promises”, and that lecteurs sont sensibles, durant the lecture of l’élément conditionnel lui-même. Expand
Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change
Evidence is presented that SSAs are interpreted as a form of consequentialist argument, inviting inferences about the speaker's (or writer’s) attitudes, and that this degree of internal coherence influences the perceived strength and persuasiveness of the argument. Expand


Conditional advice and inducements: are readers sensitive to implicit speech acts during comprehension?
A semantic distinction between speech act categories is supported, but pragmatic differences within categories are revealed, suggesting that speech acts from the same category are harder to discriminate than those from different categories. Expand
Inducements: On the phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats, and warnings
SummaryThis study examines the purposive-causal use of IF in inducements (conditional threats and promises). It is shown that subjects are sensitive to the relations obtaining among conditionalExpand
Sensitivity to speaker control in the online comprehension of conditional tips and promises: an eye-tracking study.
It is found that readers are sensitive to whether or not the speaker of a conditional has perceived control over the consequent event; conditional promises result in processing disruption for contexts where this control is absent. Expand
Promise is debt, threat another matter: the effect of credibility on the interpretation of conditional promises and threats.
The results of the inference task and an analysis of the reasons people give for their answers suggest that the credibility of promises is less affected by the use of excessive consequents than the credibility, whereas threat is another matter. Expand
Conditional reasoning with inducements and advice
The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that this difference arose from the fact that the speaker of an inducement is normally seen to have control over the consequent event whereas the giver of advice does not. Expand
Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds : An eye-movement investigation
Counterfactual reasoning is valid reasoning arising from premises that are true in a hypothetical model, but false in actuality. Investigations of counterfactuals have concentrated on reasoning andExpand
An Eye-Tracking Investigation into Readers' Sensitivity to Actual versus Expected Utility in the Comprehension of Conditionals
It is found that readers were sensitive to conditional utility—conditionals for which the consequent utility mismatched the utility that would be anticipated on the basis of prior context resulted in processing disruption and suggests that the evaluation of a conditional's utility informs the early stages of conditional processing. Expand
The social and communicative function of conditional statements
In this paper, I discuss conditionals as illocutionary speech acts whose interpretation depends upon the whole of the social context in which they are uttered and whose purpose is to affect theExpand
"If …": Satisficing algorithms for mapping conditional statements onto social domains
People regularly use conditional statements to communicate promises and threats, advices and warnings, permissions and obligations to other people. Given that all conditionals are formallyExpand
Consequential conditionals: invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomes.
This work shows that desirable (viz. undesirable) outcomes invite an inference to the truth of their antecedent, and shows that the more extreme the outcome is, the stronger the invited inference is. Expand