Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War

@article{Kaufmann2004ThreatIA,
  title={Threat Inflation and the Failure of the Marketplace of Ideas: The Selling of the Iraq War},
  author={Chaim Kaufmann},
  journal={International Security},
  year={2004},
  volume={29},
  pages={5-48}
}
  • Chaim Kaufmann
  • Published 6 August 2004
  • Political Science
  • International Security
such as the United States are generally believed to be better at making foreign policy than other regime types. Especially, the strong civic institutions and robust marketplaces of ideas in mature democracies are thought to substantially protect them from severe threat inflation and "myths of empire" that could promote excessively risky foreign policy adventures and wars. The marketplace of ideas helps to weed out unfounded, mendacious, or self-serving foreign policy arguments because their… 

Security Scholars for a Sensible Foreign Policy: A Study in Weberian Activism

It has always been true that foreign policy debates tend to proceed on a weak evidentiary base, with clever quips or stirring oratory regularly trumping sound analysis. According to Thucydides, for

Selling the Market Short? The Marketplace of Ideas and the Iraq War

Chaim Kaufmann's recent article on the selling of the Iraq war makes a valuable contribution both to the debate over the origins of that war and to scholarship on threat inflation.' I agree with much

Correspondence: Selling the Market Short? The Marketplace of Ideas and the Iraq War

Chaim Kaufmann’s recent article on the selling of the Iraq war makes a valuable contribution both to the debate over the origins of that war and to scholarship on threat inoation.1 I agree with much

Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq

As the costs of the invasion and occupation of Iraq mount, scholars have sought to explain how the United States came to launch this war in the first place. Many have focused on the “inflation” of

Prospecting for War: 9/11 and Selling the Iraq War

Current literature on the foreign policy process focuses almost entirely on elite packaging of foreign policy prospects with little attention to why the general population accepts or rejects their

External Threats and Domestic Public Opinion

An enormous literature has suggested that domestic politics shape states’ foreign policy decisions, including their decisions to use military force. However, the relationship could also run in

Justifications for the Iraq War: An analysis of the government's public case for war, 2001 to 2003

This dissertation involves a content analysis of public discussion by government officials involved in the debate over the use of force against Iraq. Elite participants in government made public

Between freedom and fear: Explaining the consensus on terrorism and democracy in US foreign policy

  • M. Boyle
  • Political Science, Sociology
  • 2011
Why have two successive US administrations concluded that fighting terrorism must involve democracy promotion? This assumption became prevalent in US political discourse following the events of

More spinn’d against than spinning? Public opinion, political communication, and Britain’s involvement in the 2003 invasion of Iraq

When Tony Blair took Britain to war in Iraq in 2003, he overruled vociferous opposition from both the wider public and members of his own governing party. Public opinion was exercised by the issue

The constraining dynamics of public opinion

Abstract : Since the beginning of the Cold War, the influence of public opinion on presidential decision-making has been debated. Because the United States is a democracy, one would expect that
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES

The Confrontation between Iraq and the US: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Deterrence

The American confrontation with Iraq poses important questions for scholarship as well as policy, and many of these involve whether various forms of deterrence can be effective. Our theories in this

Understanding the Bush Doctrine

The invasion of Iraq, although important in itself, is even more noteworthy as a manifestation of the Bush doctrine. In a sharp break from the President's pre-September 11 views that saw American

Democracy and Victory: Why Regime Type Hardly Matters

  • M. Desch
  • Political Science
    International Security
  • 2002
are more or less likely to win wars has long been a contentious issue. The Greek general Thucydides’ chronicle of the defeat of democratic Athens in its twenty-four-year struggle with authoritarian

Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War

The Iraq war and its aftermath have raised compelling questions about the capacity of the executive branch to elicit public consent for the use of military force and about the role the media plays in

Promoting the National Interest

the continued references to the "post-Cold War period." Yet such peri ods of transition are important, because they offer strategic opportunities. During these fluid times, one can affect the shape

Democracies at War

Why do democracies win wars? This is a critical question in the study of international relations, as a traditional view--expressed most famously by Alexis de Tocqueville--has been that democracies

Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror

Richard ClarkeNew York: Free Press, 2004. xiv, 305pp, $37.50 cloth (ISBN 0-7432-6024-4)Political memoirs--especially, for some reason, those written by Americans--are usually tepid affairs that do

The Iraq War Reader: History, Documents, Opinions

A single-volume reference containing analysis and commentary on the 2003 war with Iraq that cuts through media hype and government spin with the aim of providing a balanced picture of the conflict.

The Persian Gulf War: Lessons for Strategy, Law, and Diplomacy

Preface Introduction: The Geography and Geopolitics of the Persian Gulf by Christopher C. Joyner Strategic and Political Dimensions The Roots of Crisis: Iraq and Iran by Edmund Ghareeb Strategic and

The art of political manipulation

In twelve entertaining stories from history and current events, a noted political scientist and game theorist shows us how some of our heroes we as well as ordinary folk have manipulated their