This Isn’t the Free Will Worth Looking For

@article{Monroe2017ThisIT,
  title={This Isn’t the Free Will Worth Looking For},
  author={Andrew Elliott Monroe and Garrett L. Brady and Bertram F. Malle},
  journal={Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year={2017},
  volume={8},
  pages={191 - 199}
}
According to previous research, threatening people’s belief in free will may undermine moral judgments and behavior. Four studies tested this claim. Study 1 used a Velten technique to threaten people’s belief in free will and found no effects on moral behavior, judgments of blame, and punishment decisions. Study 2 used six different threats to free will and failed to find effects on judgments of blame and wrongness. Study 3 found no effects on moral judgment when manipulating general free will… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Professional Judges’ Disbelief in Free Will Does Not Decrease Punishment
There is a debate in psychology and philosophy on the societal consequences of casting doubts about individuals’ belief in free will. Research suggests that experimentally reducing free will beliefs
Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior
TLDR
Overall, these studies show that believing in free will impacts fundamental social-cognitive processes that are involved in the understanding of others’ behavior, and psychological research demonstrates that questioning its existence impacts social behavior.
The Correlates and Consequences of Believing in Free Will
Research has indicated that weakening people’s belief in free will may likewise weaken their belief in moral responsibility and potentially license them to morally transgress. Recent studies in
Free to blame? Belief in free will is related to victim blaming
TLDR
It is found that the more individuals believe in free will, the more they blame victims and the results contribute to a more differentiated view of the role of free will beliefs and attributed intentions.
Are Free Will Believers Nicer People? (Four Studies Suggest Not)
  • D. Crone, N. Levy
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Social psychological and personality science
  • 2019
TLDR
The findings suggest that the FWB–moral behavior association (and accompanying concerns regarding decreases in FWBs causing moral degeneration) may be overstated.
Free will beliefs predict attitudes toward unethical behavior and criminal punishment
TLDR
Evidence is found that the link between free will beliefs and intolerance of unethical behavior was moderated by variations in countries’ institutional integrity, defined as the degree to which countries had accountable, corruption-free public sectors.
Free to help? An experiment on free will belief and altruism
TLDR
The findings indicate that the effects of free will belief on prosocial behavior are more nuanced than previously suggested.
Determined To Conform? Addressing The Need To Replicate Free Will Effects
(Dis)belief in free will has been associated with a host of behavioral outcomes. One such association links free will belief and (lack of) conformity (Alquist, Ainsworth, & Baumeister, 2013). Despite
Does encouraging a belief in determinism increase cheating? Reconsidering the value of believing in free will
TLDR
It is suggested that manipulating free will beliefs in a robust way is more difficult than has been implied by prior work, and that the proposed link with immoral behavior may not be as consistent as previous work suggests.
The weirdness of belief in free will
TLDR
This paper looks at the folk concept of free will and its critical assessment in the context of recent psychological research and finds that unlike Lithuanian, Chinese, Hindi and Mongolian lexical expressions of "free will" do not refer to the same concept free will.
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
Free Will and Punishment: A Mechanistic View of Human Nature Reduces Retribution
TLDR
Results illustrate that exposure to debates about free will and to scientific research on the neural basis of behavior may have consequences for attributions of moral responsibility.
Bringing free will down to Earth: People’s psychological concept of free will and its role in moral judgment
TLDR
Two prominent models of the folk concept of free will are tested-a metaphysical model, in which free will involves a soul as an uncaused "first mover," and a psychological model, which involves choice, alignment with desires, and lack of constraints.
Free Will Without Metaphysics
Free will is the ability to transform thoughts and desires into actions, and this ability to act freely is presumed to underlie people’s practice of moral praise and blame, as well society’s practice
Why we forgive what can’t be controlled
TLDR
How, when and why control influences moral judgment is clarified and an agent who chooses to do the right thing but accidentally causes a bad outcome receives relatively more punishment than anAgent who is forced to doThe "right" thing but causes abad outcome.
Is Belief in Free Will a Cultural Universal
Recent experimental research has revealed surprising patterns in people's intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. One limitation of this research, however, is that it has been conducted
From Uncaused Will to Conscious Choice: The Need to Study, Not Speculate About People’s Folk Concept of Free Will
People’s concept of free will is often assumed to be incompatible with the deterministic, scientific model of the universe. Indeed, many scholars treat the folk concept of free will as assuming a
An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment.
TLDR
The results demonstrated that the impact of BFW on TPP is context-dependent; perhaps explaining in part why the philosophical debate between free will and determinism is so stubbornly persistent.
Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility
TLDR
The more an actor was identified with an action, the more likely observers were to assign responsibility to the actor, even when the action was performed under constraints so powerful that no other behavioral option was available.
Innocent intentions: A correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity
TLDR
It is found that the extent to which innocent intentions are taken to mitigate blame for accidental harms is correlated with activation in a specific brain region during moral judgment, the right temporo-parietal junction.
Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibility
Philosophers working in the nascent field of ‘experimental philosophy’ have begun using methods borrowed from psychology to collect data about folk intuitions concerning debates ranging from action
...
1
2
3
4
5
...