• Corpus ID: 26365077

Thinking Outside the Toolbox: Towards a More Productive Engagement Between Metaphysics and Philosophy of Physics

@inproceedings{French2012ThinkingOT,
  title={Thinking Outside the Toolbox: Towards a More Productive Engagement Between Metaphysics and Philosophy of Physics},
  author={Steven French and Kerry McKenzie},
  year={2012}
}
he relationship between metaphysics and science has recently become the focus of increased attention. Ladyman and Ross, in particular, have accused even naturalistically inclined metaphysicians of pursuing little more than the philosophy of A-level chemistry and have suggested that analytic metaphysics should simply be discontinued. In contrast, we shall argue, first of all, that even metaphysics that is disengaged from modern science may offer a set of resources that can be appropriated by… 

Building Bridges with the Right Tools: Modality and the Standard Model

The current state of the relationship between metaphysics and the philosophy of science might appear to be one best described as ‘hostility on both sides’. In an attempt to bridge this gap, French

Structural Realism and the Toolbox of Metaphysics

Recent developments in the scientific realism debate have resulted in a form of ‘exemplar driven’ realism that eschews general ‘recipes’ and instead focuses on the specific, ‘local’ reasons for

Making New Tools From the Toolbox of Metaphysics

In this review, I specify the metametaphysical background in which Alastair Wilson’s “The Nature of Contingency” (Oxford University Press, 2020) should be properly understood. Metaphysics, as a

Digging Deeper: Why Metaphysics is More Than a Toolbox

Steven French (J Gen Philos Sci, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-018-9401-8, 2018) proposes a vindication of “scientifically disinterested” metaphysics that leaves little room to its original

Digging Deeper: Why Metaphysics is More Than a Toolbox

  • B. Vetter
  • Philosophy
    Journal for General Philosophy of Science
  • 2018
Steven French (J Gen Philos Sci, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-018-9401-8, 2018) proposes a vindication of “scientifically disinterested” metaphysics that leaves little room to its original

Metaphysics Within Science: Against Radical Naturalism

In Every Thing Must Go James Ladyman and Don Ross argue for a radical version of naturalistic metaphysics and propose that contemporary analytic metaphysics is detached from science and should be

Defending eliminative structuralism and a whole lot more (or less).

  • S. French
  • Philosophy
    Studies in history and philosophy of science
  • 2019

Analytic Metaphysics Versus Naturalized Metaphysics: The Relevance of Applied Ontology

The relevance of analytic metaphysics has come under criticism: Ladyman and Ross, for instance, have suggested do discontinue the field. French and McKenzie have argued in defense of analytic

Humean Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science

Humeanism is often taken to be a prime example of metaphysics which has failed to be sufficient attention to contemporary science. I argue that these claims have been made too hastily: there are

Entanglement and the Metaphysician on the Clapham Omnibus

AbstractThis paper explores some of the consequences of quantum entanglement for the mainstream metaphysician. The basic idea that entanglement has metaphysical consequences in the form of some kind
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES

Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics

Philosophy of science has a complicated – almost schizophrenic – relationship with metaphysics. Studying topics such as the nature of causation, laws of nature, and spacetime, it clearly engages in

Lewis's Worldmate Relation and the Apparent Failure of Humean Supervenience

This paper considers two aspects of Lewis's metaphysics to which spatiotemporal relations appear central, with the aim of showing them to be less so. First, Lewis reluctantly characterises what it is

Where No Mind Has Gone Before: Exploring Laws in Distant and Lonely Worlds

Do the laws of nature supervene on ordinary, non‐nomic matters of fact? Lange’s criticism of Humean supervenience (HS) plays a key role in his account of natural laws. Though we are sympathetic to

On What Grounds What

ion: The grounding relations are relations of abstraction. The derivative entities, in order to be an ‘‘ontological free lunch’’ and count as no further addition, ought to be already latent within

Papers in metaphysics and epistemology

Introduction 1. New Work for a theory of universals 2. Putnam's paradox 3. Against structural universals 4. A comment on Armstrong and Forrest 5. Extrinsic properties 6. Defining 'intrinsic' (with

The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence

A useful context is provided by Floridi’s account of the relationship between ‘ontic’ and ‘epistemic’ structural realisms and some brief remarks on possible extensions of OSR into other scientific domains are made.

Structuralist Approaches to Physics: Objects, Models and Modality

My goal is to develop a structuralist approach to the objects of physics that is ­realist – but there are obstacles in the way. This paper is about three of them. The first is familiar, having

Against quidditism

modal realism is incompatible with quidditism, for we cannot have two structures which are structurally indistinguishable but nevertheless distinct. (Lewis argues this in some detail [10, pp.

Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility

Doubts about a maxim like Hume’s have a variety of historical sources. Some date back as far as Descartes’s claim that, since he can conceive himself in a purely mental condition, his essence is only

Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature

Preface CHAPTER 1: LAWS FORM COUNTERFACTUALLY STABLE SETS 1. Welcome 2. Their necessity sets the laws apart 3. The laws's persistence under counterfactuals 4. Nomic preservation 5. Beyond nomic