Therapy response evaluation of malignant lymphoma in a multicenter study: comparison of manual and semiautomatic measurements in CT.

@article{Wessling2014TherapyRE,
  title={Therapy response evaluation of malignant lymphoma in a multicenter study: comparison of manual and semiautomatic measurements in CT.},
  author={Johannes Wessling and Christoph Sch{\"u}lke and R. Koch and N. Kohlhase and L. H. Wassenaar and R. M. Mesters and Anna J. H{\"o}ink and M D Anastasi and Martina Karpitschka and Michael Fabel and Asmus Wulff and Daniel Pinto dos Santos and Andreas Kie{\ss}ling and Anno Graser and Lars Bornemann and Volker Dicken and Walter Heindel and Boris Buerke},
  journal={RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin},
  year={2014},
  volume={186 8},
  pages={
          768-79
        }
}
  • J. Wessling, C. Schülke, B. Buerke
  • Published 4 February 2014
  • Medicine
  • RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin
PURPOSE Comparison of manual one-/bi-dimensional measurements versus semi-automatically derived one-/bi-dimensional and volumetric measurements for therapy response evaluation of malignant lymphoma during CT follow-up examinations in a multicenter setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS MSCT data sets of patients with malignant lymphoma were evaluated before (baseline) and after two cycles of chemotherapy (follow-up) at radiological centers of five university hospitals. The long axis diameter (LAD… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Radiological evaluation of the therapeutic response of malignant diseases: status quo, innovative developments and requirements for radiology.
TLDR
The following article provides an overview of the established and still widely spread imaging modalities and evaluation criteria with regard to oncological diseases as well as of the increasing demands on radiology that result from these developments.
Criteria-Based Imaging and Response Evaluation of Lymphoma 20 Years After Cheson: What is New? - A Review of the Current Classifications.
TLDR
The two latest classifications of response evaluation of lymphoma are the Lugano classification, which has been steadily developed over the past 20 years and has been specially adapted to technical progress, as well as the evaluation method RECIL, which is based on the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) classification already established for solid tumors.
Sketch-Based Interactive Segmentation and Segmentation Editing for Oncological Therapy Monitoring – PhD Thesis Summary –
TLDR
This thesis tackled the problems of interactive segmentation, the editing of a given segmentation result, and the accurate and reproducible measurement of a tumor’s volume based on agiven segmentation mask in the context of oncological therapy response assessment.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
Semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases during follow-up—initial results
TLDR
Semi-automated volumetric analysis allows fast and convenient segmentation of most lymph node metastases and compared with RECIST the inter-observer-variability in baseline and follow-up is reduced.
Prediction of Lymph Node Manifestations in Malignant Lymphoma: Significant Role of Volumetric Compared With Established Metric Lymph Node Analysis in Multislice Computed Tomography
TLDR
Volumetric lymph node analysis is significantly superior compared with established LAD in the prediction of lymph node involvement and therefore can add to the definition of peripheral lymphoma target lesions.
Semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma stage III/IV-A feasibility study
TLDR
Investigation of the feasibility of semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma found the software allows a fast and robust segmentation in up to 80% of all cases and the ease of use and time needed are acceptable.
Lung cancer: computerized quantification of tumor response--initial results.
TLDR
Compared with the unidimensional and bidimensional techniques, semiautomated tumor segmentation enabled the identification of a larger number of patients with absolute changes in tumor volume of at least 20% and 30%.
Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response.
  • J. Erasmus, G. Gladish, R. Munden
  • Medicine
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • 2003
TLDR
Measurements of lung tumor size on CT scans are often inconsistent and can lead to an incorrect interpretation of tumor response, but can be improved if the same reader performs serial measurements for any one patient.
Measuring tumor response and shape change on CT: esophageal cancer as a paradigm.
TLDR
The eccentricity factor was introduced for measuring the degree to which tumor shape diverges from a perfect sphere and greater change in eccentricity is associated with greater discordance between WHO and RECIST.
Measurement accuracy and reproducibility of semiautomated metric and volumetric lymph node analysis in MDCT.
TLDR
Semiautomatic short-axis diameter, particularly volume measurements, of lymph nodes are, irrespective of location, precise in terms of reproducibility and appear to be considerably more reliable than manual lymph node assessment.
Enlarged cervical lymph nodes at helical CT.
TLDR
The L/T at helical CT provide an accurate assessment of reactive versus malignant nodes in the head and neck.
Development of adapted RECIST criteria to assess response in lymphoma and their comparison to the International Workshop Criteria
TLDR
The lymphoma-adapted RECIST is simpler to apply than the I WC and yields near identical response rates and should be considered for inclusion into any new draft of the IWC.
...
...