Theory of mind in nonhuman primates

@article{Heyes1998TheoryOM,
  title={Theory of mind in nonhuman primates},
  author={Cecilia Heyes},
  journal={Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
  year={1998},
  volume={21},
  pages={101 - 114}
}
  • C. Heyes
  • Published 1 February 1998
  • Psychology, Biology
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Since the BBS article in which Premack and Woodruff (1978) asked “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?,” it has been repeatedly claimed that there is observational and experimental evidence that apes have mental state concepts, such as “want” and “know.” Unlike research on the development of theory of mind in childhood, however, no substantial progress has been made through this work with nonhuman primates. A survey of empirical studies of imitation, self-recognition, social relationships… 

Theory of Mind in Chimpanzees: A Rationalist Approach

The question of whether or not chimpanzees possess the ability to mentally represent others' mental states has been a popular question since Premack and Woodruff (1978) originally asked the question.

Do monkeys have a theory of mind? How to answer the question?

  • H. Meunier
  • Psychology, Biology
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • 2017

How to Build a Scrub-Jay that Reads Minds

The underlying assumption that forms the basis for this research, is that ToM did not appear de novo in the evolutionary record of humans, so other animals should at least demonstrate some of the precursors of socio-cognitive processing demonstrated by Homo sapiens.

Comparative social cognition.

It is concluded that animals are excellent ethologists, but on the whole, poor psychologists, and those studies that present a good case for mental attribution all possess high ecological validity, including studies on food competition by chimpanzees and cache-protection strategies by corvids.

‘Theory of mind’ in animals: ways to make progress

It is true that existing setups cannot conclusively demonstrate ‘theory of mind’ in non-human animals, but focusing on this fact is unlikely to be productive; the more interesting question is how sophisticated their social reasoning can be, whether it is about ‘unobservable inner experiences’ or not.

Chimpanzee mind reading: Don't stop believing

It is concluded that chimpanzees may reason about belief, but that there is already compelling evidence that they reason about perceptions.

Animal mindreading: what’s the problem?

  • C. Heyes
  • Psychology
    Psychonomic bulletin & review
  • 2015
This article suggests that the problems are theoretical and methodological: there is difficulty in conceptualising alternatives to ‘full-blown’ mindreading, and reluctance to use the kinds of empirical methods necessary to distinguish mindreading from other psychological mechanisms.

Metamemory as evidence of animal consciousness: the type that does the trick

It is argued that if it were found that an animal had a memory trace which allowed it to use information about a past perceptual stimulus to inform a range of different behaviours, that would indeed be good evidence that the animal was conscious.

Theory of Mind in the wild

THE DEGREE OF CIllMPANZEE THEORY OF MIND AND THE EVOLUTION OF MODULARITY

Chimpanzees may not have a ToM that is equal to the authors' own, but they nevertheless exhibit behaviors that are indeed indicative of having one as illustrated by comparison to other extant primate research.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 200 REFERENCES

Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?

Abstract An individual has a theory of mind if he imputes mental states to himself and others. A system of inferences of this kind is properly viewed as a theory because such states are not directly

Complementary Methods and Convergent Evidence in the Study of Primate Social Cognition1)

Studies of primate social cognition aim at a) documentation of social behaviors that appear to require an understanding in the animals of their own relationships and the relationships among others;

Studies of imitation in chimpanzees and children.

Monkeys, apes, mirrors and minds: The evolution of self-awareness in primates

The methodology and evidence for self-recognition in primates along with the assumption that this ability is an indicator of self-awareness are reviewed, and the failure of the gorilla to master the task is discussed in some detail.

Self‐awareness and the emergence of mind in primates

  • G. G. Gallup
  • Psychology, Biology
    American journal of primatology
  • 1982
An attempt is made to show that self‐awareness, consciousness, and mind are not mutually exclusive cognitive categories and that the emergence of self-awareness may be equivalent to the emergenceof mind.

CHAPTER 15 – Do Apes Ape?

Exploring Primate Social Cognition: Some Critical Remarks1)

The paper expresses the authors' views on the growing interest in primate social cognition, particularly among descriptive primate ethologists. Its characteristics are the hope to extract cognitive

The theory of mind impairment in autism: Evidence for a modular mechanism of development?

A much greater corpus of data is available against which to test the preliminary conculsions made at that time, and to do so is the purpose of this chapter.

Theories of theories of mind: When does smart behaviour-reading become mind-reading?

Introduction The question of whether or not an individual is discriminating between others' states of mind is commonly addressed through a contrast with the alternative that it is merely
...