Theorizing in IS Research: What Came Before and What Comes Next?

@article{Holmstrm2005TheorizingII,
  title={Theorizing in IS Research: What Came Before and What Comes Next?},
  author={Jonny Holmstr{\"o}m},
  journal={Scandinavian J. Inf. Systems},
  year={2005},
  volume={17},
  pages={2}
}
Over the past decades, the IS community has adapted theories, methodologies, and philosophies from reference disciplines to solidify its domain. This has contributed to the diversity and pluralism in our field. As the IS discipline has evolved with relatively permeable research boundaries over the years, the diversity in theoretical underpinnings has been not only healthy but also essential to the evolution of our discipline. I find the challenges raised by Rose, Jones, and Truex to both… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 references

What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is,

K. E. Weick
Administrative Science Quarterly, • 1995
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

What theory is not

View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Nothing at the Center? Information Systems as a Reference Discipline?,

K. Lyytinen, J. King
Journal of the Association for Information Systems • 2004
View 1 Excerpt

Editors Comments: Theoretically Speaking,

R. Weber
MIS Quarterly • 2003
View 1 Excerpt

Structuration and IS,

M. Jones
Re-Thinking Management Information Systems, • 1997
View 1 Excerpt

The Debate in Structural Linguistics: How It May Impact the Information Systems Field,

D. Truex, R. Baskerville
Association for Information Systems 3rd Annual Conference of the Americas, • 1997
View 2 Excerpts

Case Study Research, Design and Methods, (2nd ed.)

R. K. Yin
Sage, London, • 1994
View 1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…