The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff

  title={The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff},
  author={Adam Waytz and James Dungan and Liane Young},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},

Figures and Tables from this paper

The psychology of whistleblowing

Voice or silence: antecedents of whistleblowing intentions

This study aims to examine the effects of peer ethical behavior and individual differences in valuation of fairness vs loyalty on whistleblowing intentions in academic settings. This study also tests

The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions

Loyalty over Fairness: Acceptance of Unfair Supreme Court Procedures

Evidence of procedural fairness leads individuals to support Supreme Court decisions, even ones with which they disagree. Yet, in some settings, unfair behavior is seen as acceptable, even

An Experimental Study on Potential Whistleblowing Intentions: A Dilemma of Fairness and the Risk of Reporting

We experimentally examine how the power distance in a conspiracy affects the potential whistleblowing motivation of those who are illegally involved. To test our hypotheses, we employed a 2

Corruption in the Context of Moral Trade-offs

Moral psychology has begun to characterize the circumstances that lead people to commit moral violations. However, the decision to engage in corrupt behaviour may not always reflect a choice between

Buying Unethical Loyalty: A Behavioral Paradigm and Empirical Test

Unethical behavior is often accompanied by others covering up a transgressor’s actions. We devised a novel behavioral paradigm, the Unethical Loyalty Game (ULG), to study individuals’ willingness to

“They should have followed the rules”: Trade-offs Between Fairness and Authority Values Predict Judgments of Social Justice Protests

In 2017, Colin Kaepernick drew global attention by kneeling during the national anthem before a football game. The protest divided the country into two groups: those who supported Kaepernick’s stand

Stuck between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Whistleblower’s Dilemma

Given the conflicting attitudes that people have toward those who report wrongdoing and a lack of empirical research specifically examining subsequent hiring, it is an open question as to whether

The social psychology of whistleblowing: An integrated model

Whistleblowing is the disclosure of ingroup wrongdoing to an external agency and can have important functions for the regulation of moral and legal conduct. Organizational research has focused



Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.

Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control

The growing body of whistleblowing literature includes many studies that have attempted to identify the individual level antecedents of whistleblowing behavior. However, cross-cultural differences in

Guilt Proneness and Moral Character

Guilt proneness is a personality trait indicative of a predisposition to experience negative feelings about personal wrongdoing, even when the wrongdoing is private. It is characterized by the

Whistleblowing and employee loyalty

Discussions of whistleblowing and employee loyalty usually assume either that the concept of loyalty is irrelevant to the issue or, more commonly, that whistleblowing involves a moral choice in which

Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing's Antecedents: Learning from Research on Identity and Ethics Programs

ABSTRACT: Despite a significant increase in whistle-blowing practices in work organizations, we know little about what differentiates whistle-blowers from those who observe a wrongdoing but chose not

Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict

Results of 2 experiments supported the proposal that empathy-induced altruism can lead one to act in a way that violates the moral principle of justice. In each experiment, participants were asked to

Culture and moral judgment: how are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved?

Results imply that Indians possess a postconventional moral code in which interpersonal responsibilities are seen in as fully principled terms as justice obligations and may be accorded precedence over justice obligations.

Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.

Relationship regulation theory predicts that any action, including violence, unequal treatment, and "impure" acts, may be perceived as morally correct depending on the moral motive employed and how the relevant social relationship is construed.