The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff

  title={The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff},
  author={Adam Waytz and James Dungan and Liane Young},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Voice or silence: antecedents of whistleblowing intentions
This study aims to examine the effects of peer ethical behavior and individual differences in valuation of fairness vs loyalty on whistleblowing intentions in academic settings. This study also tests
The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions
Loyalty over Fairness: Acceptance of Unfair Supreme Court Procedures
Evidence of procedural fairness leads individuals to support Supreme Court decisions, even ones with which they disagree. Yet, in some settings, unfair behavior is seen as acceptable, even
An Experimental Study on Potential Whistleblowing Intentions: A Dilemma of Fairness and the Risk of Reporting
We experimentally examine how the power distance in a conspiracy affects the potential whistleblowing motivation of those who are illegally involved. To test our hypotheses, we employed a 2
Corruption in the Context of Moral Trade-offs
Moral psychology has begun to characterize the circumstances that lead people to commit moral violations. However, the decision to engage in corrupt behaviour may not always reflect a choice between
Buying Unethical Loyalty: A Behavioral Paradigm and Empirical Test
Unethical behavior is often accompanied by others covering up a transgressor’s actions. We devised a novel behavioral paradigm, the Unethical Loyalty Game (ULG), to study individuals’ willingness to
“They should have followed the rules”: Trade-offs Between Fairness and Authority Values Predict Judgments of Social Justice Protests
In 2017, Colin Kaepernick drew global attention by kneeling during the national anthem before a football game. The protest divided the country into two groups: those who supported Kaepernick’s stand
Punish or Protect? How Close Relationships Shape Responses to Moral Violations
It is shown that people consistently anticipate protecting close others who commit moral infractions, particularly highly severe acts of theft and sexual harassment, and that people justify this tendency by planning to discipline close others on their own.
Stuck between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Whistleblower’s Dilemma
Given the conflicting attitudes that people have toward those who report wrongdoing and a lack of empirical research specifically examining subsequent hiring, it is an open question as to whether


Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.
Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control
The growing body of whistleblowing literature includes many studies that have attempted to identify the individual level antecedents of whistleblowing behavior. However, cross-cultural differences in
Guilt Proneness and Moral Character
Guilt proneness is a personality trait indicative of a predisposition to experience negative feelings about personal wrongdoing, even when the wrongdoing is private. It is characterized by the
Whistleblowing and employee loyalty
Discussions of whistleblowing and employee loyalty usually assume either that the concept of loyalty is irrelevant to the issue or, more commonly, that whistleblowing involves a moral choice in which
Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing's Antecedents: Learning from Research on Identity and Ethics Programs
ABSTRACT: Despite a significant increase in whistle-blowing practices in work organizations, we know little about what differentiates whistle-blowers from those who observe a wrongdoing but chose not
Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict
Results of 2 experiments supported the proposal that empathy-induced altruism can lead one to act in a way that violates the moral principle of justice. In each experiment, participants were asked to
Culture and moral judgment: how are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved?
Results imply that Indians possess a postconventional moral code in which interpersonal responsibilities are seen in as fully principled terms as justice obligations and may be accorded precedence over justice obligations.
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.
Relationship regulation theory predicts that any action, including violence, unequal treatment, and "impure" acts, may be perceived as morally correct depending on the moral motive employed and how the relevant social relationship is construed.