The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age

@article{Lozano2012TheWR,
  title={The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age},
  author={G. Lozano and V. Larivi{\`e}re and Y. Gingras},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2012},
  volume={abs/1205.4328}
}
Historically, papers have been physically bound to the journal in which they were published; but in the digital age papers are available individually, no longer tied to their respective journals. Hence, papers now can be read and cited based on their own merits, independently of the journal's physical availability, reputation, or impact factor (IF). We compare the strength of the relationship between journals' IFs and the actual citations received by their respective papers from 1902 to 2009… Expand

Figures and Topics from this paper

Are elite journals declining?
Scientific journals still matter in the era of academic search engines and preprint archives
Weak Relations among the Impact Factors, Number of Citations, References and Authors
Editorial
Rise of the Rest: The Growing Impact of Non-Elite Journals
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics
Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
  • H. Moed
  • Computer Science
  • J. Informetrics
  • 2010
Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?
  • G. Whitehouse
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The British journal of radiology
  • 2001
CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS
Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications
Lifting the crown - citation z-score
Revisiting the Journal Impact Factor
History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences
The impact factor follies.
...
1
2
3
...