The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age

@article{Lozano2012TheWR,
  title={The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age},
  author={G. Lozano and V. Larivi{\`e}re and Y. Gingras},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2012},
  volume={abs/1205.4328}
}
  • G. Lozano, V. Larivière, Y. Gingras
  • Published 2012
  • Computer Science, Physics
  • ArXiv
  • Historically, papers have been physically bound to the journal in which they were published; but in the digital age papers are available individually, no longer tied to their respective journals. Hence, papers now can be read and cited based on their own merits, independently of the journal's physical availability, reputation, or impact factor (IF). We compare the strength of the relationship between journals' IFs and the actual citations received by their respective papers from 1902 to 2009… CONTINUE READING

    Figures and Topics from this paper.

    Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

    A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
    • 390
    • PDF
    Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
    • 233
    • PDF
    A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions
    • 110
    • PDF
    Are elite journals declining?
    • 34
    • PDF
    Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
    • 604
    • PDF
    Rise of the Rest: The Growing Impact of Non-Elite Journals
    • 31
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
    Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
    • 476
    • PDF
    The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics
    • 105
    • PDF
    CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS
    • 324
    The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007
    • 96
    • PDF
    Lifting the crown - citation z-score
    • 223
    • PDF
    Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?
    • 77
    History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences
    • 195
    • PDF
    Is Peer Review in Decline?
    • 95