The virtues of frugality – why cosmological observers should release their data slowly

@article{Starkman2009TheVO,
  title={The virtues of frugality – why cosmological observers should release their data slowly},
  author={Glenn D Starkman and R Trotta and Pascal M. Vaudrevange},
  journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters},
  year={2009},
  volume={401}
}
Cosmologists will soon be in a unique position. Observational noise will gradually be replaced by cosmic variance as the dominant source of uncertainty in an increasing number of observations. We reflect on the ramifications for the discovery and verification of new models. If there are features in the full data set that call for a new model, there will be no subsequent observations to test that model's predictions. We give specific examples of the problem by discussing the pitfalls of model… 
Dark energy model selection with current and future data
The main goal of the next generation of weak lensing probes is to constrain cosmological parameters by measuring the mass distribution and geometry of the low redshift Universe and thus to test the
General Relativity and Cosmology: Unsolved Questions and Future Directions
For the last 100 years, General Relativity (GR) has taken over the gravitational theory mantle held by Newtonian Gravity for the previous 200 years. This article reviews the status of GR in terms of

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
Applications of Bayesian model selection to cosmological parameters
Bayesian model selection is a tool to decide whether the introduction of a new parameter is warranted by data. I argue that the usual sampling statistic significance tests for a null hypothesis can
Forecasting the Bayes factor of a future observation
I present a new procedure to forecast the Bayes factor of a future observation by computing the Predictive Posterior Odds Distribution (PPOD). This can assess the power of future experiments to
Constraining the topology of the universe.
TLDR
The first year data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe are used to place stringent constraints on the topology of the Universe, and the nondetection rules out the possibility that the authors live in a universe with topology scale smaller than 24 Gpc.
FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE * OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) 5-year data provide stringent limits on deviations from the minimal, six-parameter Λ cold dark matter model. We report these limits and use them to
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE (WMAP *) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
The combination of seven-year data from WMAP and improved astrophysical data rigorously tests the standard cosmological model and places new constraints on its basic parameters and extensions. By
Significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP
We investigate anomalies reported in the Cosmic Microwave Background maps from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite on very large angular scales and discuss possible
Getting the measure of the flatness problem
The problem of estimating cosmological parameters such as from noisy or incomplete data is an example of inverse problems and, as such, generally requires a probabilistic approach. We adopt the
First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters
WMAP precision data enable accurate testing of cosmological models. We find that the emerging standard model of cosmology, a flat � -dominated universe seeded by a nearly scale-invariant adiabatic
Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
TLDR
This review is an introduction to Bayesian methods in cosmology and astrophysics and recent results in the field, and presents Bayesian probability theory and its conceptual underpinnings, Bayes' Theorem and the role of priors.
Examination of evidence for a preferred axis in the cosmic radiation anisotropy.
TLDR
It is found that the amount of power concentrated in planar modes for l = 2,3 is not inconsistent with isotropy and Gaussianity, but the multipoles' alignment is indeed anomalous and extends up to l = 5 rejecting statistical isotropy with a probability in excess of 99.9%.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...