The two dogmas of empiricism

@inproceedings{Quine1951TheTD,
  title={The two dogmas of empiricism},
  author={W. Quine},
  year={1951}
}
  • W. Quine
  • Published 1951
  • Philosophy, Sociology
Modern empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of matters of fact, and truths which aresynthetic, or grounded in fact. The other dogma is reductionism: the belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to some logical construct upon terms which refer to immediate experience. Both dogmas, I shall argue, are ill-founded. One effect of abandoning them is… Expand
3,190 Citations
The Last Dogma of Empiricism
  • 3
Analysis, Schmanalysis
  • 1
A Defence of Kantian Synthetic-Analytic Distinction
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
A Plea For a Naturalistic Ontology
  • PDF
Two dogmas of analytic historiography
  • 1
Beyond Semiological Reductionism
W. V. Quine’s “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”
  • 1
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES
Two Dogmas of Empiricism
  • 1
Methods of Logic
  • 493
A Survey Of Symbolic Logic
  • 363
New Foundations for Mathematical Logic
  • 281
La théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure
  • 317
  • PDF
The foregoing paragraph was not part of the present essay as originally published. It was prompted by Martin
  • Philosophical Studies
  • 1952
Logical foundations of probability
  • 1,354
Meaning and Necessity (Chicago, 1947), pp. 9 ff.; Logical Foundations of Probability
  • 1950
...
1
2
3
...