The two dogmas of empiricism

@inproceedings{Quine1951TheTD,
  title={The two dogmas of empiricism},
  author={W. Quine},
  year={1951}
}
  • W. Quine
  • Published 1951
  • Philosophy, Sociology
  • Modern empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of matters of fact, and truths which aresynthetic, or grounded in fact. The other dogma is reductionism: the belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to some logical construct upon terms which refer to immediate experience. Both dogmas, I shall argue, are ill-founded. One effect of abandoning them is… CONTINUE READING
    3,164 Citations
    The Last Dogma of Empiricism
    • 3
    Analysis, Schmanalysis
    • 1
    A Defence of Kantian Synthetic-Analytic Distinction
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    A Plea For a Naturalistic Ontology
    • PDF
    Two dogmas of analytic historiography
    • 1
    Beyond Semiological Reductionism

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES
    Two Dogmas of Empiricism
    • 1
    Methods of Logic
    • 491
    A Survey Of Symbolic Logic
    • 363
    New Foundations for Mathematical Logic
    • 281
    La théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure
    • 316
    • PDF
    The foregoing paragraph was not part of the present essay as originally published. It was prompted by Martin
    • Philosophical Studies
    • 1952
    Logical foundations of probability
    • 1,357
    Meaning and Necessity (Chicago, 1947), pp. 9 ff.; Logical Foundations of Probability
    • 1950