• DOI:10.1038/NGEO1475
• Corpus ID: 55342040

The timing and pattern of biotic recovery following the end-Permian mass extinction

@article{Chen2012TheTA,
  title={The timing and pattern of biotic recovery following the end-Permian mass extinction},
  author={Zhong‐Qiang Chen and Michael J. Benton},
  journal={Nature Geoscience},
  year={2012},
  volume={5},
  pages={375-383}
}

• Zhong‐Qiang Chen, M. Benton
• Published 1 June 2012
• Environmental Science, Geography
• Nature Geoscience

The aftermath of the great end-Permian period mass extinction 252 Myr ago shows how life can recover from the loss of >90% species globally. The crisis was triggered by a number of physical environmental shocks (global warming, acid rain, ocean acidification and ocean anoxia), and some of these were repeated over the next 5-6 Myr. Ammonoids and some other groups diversified rapidly, within 1-3 Myr, but extinctions continued through the Early Triassic period. Triassic ecosystems were rebuilt stepwise from low to high trophic levels through the Early to Middle Triassic, and a stable, complex ecosystem did not re-emerge until the beginning of the Middle Triassic, 8-9 Myr after the crisis. A positive aspect of the recovery was the emergence of entirely new groups, such as marine reptiles and decapod crustaceans, as well as new tetrapods on land, including — eventually — dinosaurs. The stepwise recovery of life in the Triassic could have been delayed either by biotic drivers (complex multispecies interactions) or physical perturbations, or a combination of both. This is an example of the wider debate about the relative roles of intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of large-scale evolution. from a much more devastated planet and biota than the others. With only some 10% of species surviving, the EPME was much harsher than the other mass extinctions, during which global species diversity reduced to only about 50% of the pre-extinction total 1,2,24-26 . This means that the Triassic recovery has two profound implications: first, it may show qualitative, as well as quantitative, differences from the other post-extinction recoveries; and, second, it can act as an exemplar of what to expect, at its most extreme, when global biodiversity is pushed to the brink. There are obvious implications for current concerns about biodiversity loss and recovery resulting from human impacts 27,28 . In the past ten years, attention has focused on the sedimentary successions in south China. These are enormously laterally extensive, with some formations extending more than 2,000 km from the Zhejiang to Yunnan provinces. The huge exposures, length of the sections and improving dating open up the opportunity to explore physical environmental and biotic changes through the extinction and recovery times in varied marine habitats, and compare these with patterns elsewhere in the world (Fig. 1). A fine- scale, forensic analysis of this extraordinary time in Earth's history now becomes possible. The end-Permian mass extinction The EPME killed 80-96% of marine animal species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species